God speed Buzz!
I have read the proposal and I need to slow down and re-read it several more times. The language is so ambigous, you cannot take it at face value, because it doesn't come straight out and tell you the objective.
Now knowing the source of legislation, the end game comes into focus. I have nothing against guides and outfitters, but this proposal now deviates from being a funding mechanism and morphs into catering to a special interest. This would NOT raise the money the G&F needs, but yet you will not be able to repeal once implemented.
I have read the proposal and I need to slow down and re-read it several more times. The language is so ambigous, you cannot take it at face value, because it doesn't come straight out and tell you the objective.
Now knowing the source of legislation, the end game comes into focus. I have nothing against guides and outfitters, but this proposal now deviates from being a funding mechanism and morphs into catering to a special interest. This would NOT raise the money the G&F needs, but yet you will not be able to repeal once implemented.