The Hedgehog
Well-known member
Hey guys. It’s your last chance for a free hat.
Muley Freak in trouble?
- Thread starter Whiskey Freak
- Start date
Utah? I’d bet it was pest control, security system or solar panels. That states loves those sales especially if it’s built into a pyramid scheme
huntin24/7
Well-known member
Just went to this Aram’s Facebook page. His 5 part series on his explanation actually makes him look worse than the other couples account. I love how he admits small parts of him being wrong but in the end doesn’t own it. Textbook liar.
700 plus yard shot without taking a range? Wow. Screw it make rifle seasons open sights only, at least maybe in utah
huntin24/7
Well-known member
I think we are slowly headed that direction with the demand for tags and advanced equipment/technology. I’m all for it. A little reduced success rates might weed out some of the problems too.
ShootsManyBullets
Well-known member
KB_
Well-known member
That explains a lot.
However sales can be a very lucrative career path, if your good at it.
more_cowbell
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2023
- Messages
- 912
There’s gotta be a catchy phrase in there somewhere:
All hat and no deer
All hat and no gear
All hat and lots of gear
cgasner1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,976
Buy my gear or I’ll steal your deer?
By
Holler if your deer has a collar!
Wind Gypsy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2017
- Messages
- 2,057
I'm not for open sights only. Would probably be met with issues from the visually impaired and I think you'd still have a ton of crippled deer from people taking low odds shots with their new open sights. Would be a lot of deer wounded that would have been killed clean with a scope IMO.
Hunters in general are just terrible at shooting and have been led to believe they can just buy a range finder or ballistic turret and shoot a long ways. I'd be all for a 400 or 500 yard max legal range. Of course it would be ignored by some but it would help i think..
Hunters in general are just terrible at shooting and have been led to believe they can just buy a range finder or ballistic turret and shoot a long ways. I'd be all for a 400 or 500 yard max legal range. Of course it would be ignored by some but it would help i think..
LFC911
New member
I am following along here and don't recall if anything has been mentioned about him turning the collar in to UT DWR...i would think he would have to at some point if not already 
Mountain Man
Well-known member
Harder to see a collar at 700+ yards. It’s crazy to me the ranges both of these hunters were shooting at. Especially if you can’t reload and relocate the target yourself.
I think the max range thing would be the most doable thing and the most reasonable. I'd bug my legislators about that if it came up.
How could it be enforced? Nearly impossible I imagine.
SaskHunter
Well-known member
Plenty of rules can't be enforced unless you're caught in the act. Biggest thing would be that those long range shooters couldn't advertise and post about it and encourage sub-par hunters/shooters to do the same.
Anyway, rules and laws are only good for those who follow them.
The Hedgehog
Well-known member
There are some solid, and I mean SOLID memes on this thread, which is now locked but really good stuff.
rokslide.com
Aram Von Benedikt
Does anyone know Aram Von Benedikt? He apparently writes for Outdoor Life. It appears that while hunting in Utah on a General Season rifle hunt he decided to steal a buck that was shot by another hunter and was actively getting tracked. It's all over the socials. He has a rebuttal story, but...
rokslide.com
Holy hell that was a good laugh. Post #432 gets my voteThere are some solid, and I mean SOLID memes on this thread, which is now locked but really good stuff.
Aram Von Benedikt
Does anyone know Aram Von Benedikt? He apparently writes for Outdoor Life. It appears that while hunting in Utah on a General Season rifle hunt he decided to steal a buck that was shot by another hunter and was actively getting tracked. It's all over the socials. He has a rebuttal story, but...
