Southwind
New member
Unfortunately one of these two is going to win. I have felt unrepresented for some time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By voting for neither of the status quo, I hope my vote is one more straw on the camel's back and that the camel's back breaks, sooner rather than later.
You need to run for office, Nemont.
WICHITA, Kan. — Top officials within Charles Koch’s powerful policy network plan to meet with aides to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, the industrialist told USA TODAY on Wednesday.
The meeting comes at the request of the Trump team, Koch said. No date has been set for the gathering, which has not been publicly disclosed before.
“We are happy to talk to anybody and hope they understand where we’re coming from, and they will have more constructive positions than they’ve had,” Koch said of the sit-down with Trump’s team.
Why would you wish that on me? Afraid I wouldn't have much to offer, I have to deal with the world as it is not as I wished it were.
Nemont
Buzz, sorry to hear about the hack. To your point, I can assure you the email system where those emails should have been handled are far more secure than anything you could put in your house. All gov emails aren't created equal, and when you get a clearance they are very clear about how you should handle info, she obviously didn't listen or care.
Jose, if it was your friend or family who was overseas, and info about their activities was compromised, would you care then? To me it isn't about the server, it is the blatant disregard of her responsibilities. If I can't judge someone by their actions, and can only judge them based on their campaign promises, I give up.
Has she mentioned how she is going to hold welfare ranchers accountable?
Sorry, I will stop being a smart-ass now.
If I can't judge someone by their actions, and can only judge them based on their campaign promises
How are you with supporting racists?
That is where much of Trump's support is coming from. He may as well be wearing the white robe and hood because that is the America his supporters want to have.
Just to throw another wrench in this convo, the idea and execution of public land is fundamentally socialist.
So generally, I think of everyone supporting public land as socialists, mostly because you kind of are. Isn't language fun?
The 10 Happiest Countries:
10. Sweden
9. Australia
8. New Zealand
7. Netherlands
6. Canada
5. Finland
4. Norway
3. Iceland
2. Switzerland
1. Denmark
Maybe the dumbest quote I've ever read. Much of Trumps support comes from people who are sick of ILLEGAL immigrants. That doesn't make him or anyone that supports him a racist. My dad was in the marines for 21 years and many of our family friends are current and former military. Almost everyone of them has stated that they would never vote Hillary because she only looks out for herself and will hang you out to dry in an instant. Therefore they are trump supporters. Does that make them racist? These friends are from all over the US. Several families are Hispanic, some are African American and some are white. Use your head before you speak. Sure Trump says some dumb crap and is far from politically correct. But your comment is about as ignorant as they get.
Just to throw another wrench in this convo, the idea and execution of public land is fundamentally socialist.
So generally, I think of everyone supporting public land as socialists, mostly because you kind of are. Isn't language fun?
You stopped too soon in your expansion from the common American perception and what language literally says. Any society that agrees to taxation of income, wealth, or property, to be redistributed for other public uses is technically socialist. Any society that says we are not going to let our young, elderly, or poor die in the streets because of lack of resources, is technically socialist. Any society that agrees to have public schools is technically socialist. Any society that will conscript citizens to involuntary military service, as this country did for over 200 years, is technically socialist. Any society that uses a political system to pick economic winners and losers by socializing costs, is technically socialist.
When one thinks about it, since the first villages were formed on this planet, however many thousand or million years ago you want to believe, socialism was the basis for a village/community concept.