Time to cancel subscriptions
- Thread starter sbhooper
- Start date
RobG
Well-known member
It appears your man hangs with the liberalsOk Gramps.
I live in SD.
http://www.nssf.org/newsroom/releases/show.cfm?PR=061112.cfm&path=2012
SD anti-access bill, sonspored by a republican:
http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2013/Bill.aspx?File=HB1135P.htm
Looks like there were several attempts to take sportsmen dollars and give them to Wildlife Services under the boondogle of predator control too:
http://www.sdwfcamo.net/ht/d/sp/i/131703/pid/131703
http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2013/Bill.aspx?File=HB1135P.htm
Looks like there were several attempts to take sportsmen dollars and give them to Wildlife Services under the boondogle of predator control too:
http://www.sdwfcamo.net/ht/d/sp/i/131703/pid/131703
RobG
Well-known member
I wondered how long it would take you
. Don't get me started on Patriot Act, Real ID, and all those things.
But I have a real question for him: Ginger? Or Mary Ann?
I wondered how long it would take you
Don't get me started on Patriot Act, Real ID, and all those things.
But I have a real question for him: Ginger? Or Mary Ann?
SD is a heck of a lot better than MT when it comes to butting in on wildlife mgt, so I think he wins in that regard .
The only correct answer is: Both.
Both.
The first one appears to deal with private property and is not anti-hunting or anti-fishing.
The second one deals with animal damage control. What is anti-hunting about that?
RobG
Well-known member
Wow, in all these years that possibility never occurred to me.
Taking license dollars from hunters to fund programs that kill coyotes for ranchers isn't very smart. It's taking away funding for research, monitoring, salaries for wardens, etc and giving it to a federal agency that kills for ranchers & farmers. Sounds anti-hunter to me.
You should re-read that stream access bill. It's not good.
You should re-read that stream access bill. It's not good.
I'm here to solve important problems.
I believe in property rights. Just because my fishing pond on my property grows during a wet cycle and touches the public road doesn't mean someone can go fishing on my property.
Agriculture is the backbone of SD and killing coyotes for ranchers is fine by me.There is still plenty for me to kill.
RobG
Well-known member
Think like a liberal and the possibilities are endless.
Sp dollars dedicated to growing more mule deer instead being diverted to another Ag subsidy is ok with you? Sounds kinda like liberal claptrap to me.
Again - read the bill on access. It's not about protecting private property. It's about taking away public property.
Last edited:
Sp dollars dedicated to growing more mule deer instead being diverted to another Ag subsidy is ok with you? Sounds kinda like liberal claptrap to me.
Again - read the bill on access. It's not about protecting private property. It's about taking away public property.
Less coyotes mean more mule deer, pheasants, ducks, cows, and etc.
Where is the bill trying to take away public property?
Section 7. Nothing in this Act affects the right of the public to use public water for public
recreational access, including the touching of the bed beneath the public water, if the bed
beneath the public water is public property or the bed beneath the public water is private
property to which access is not restricted.
A person using a public water for public recreational access is subject to any other restriction lawfully placed on the use of the public water by a governmental entity with authority to restrict the use of the public water.
Nothing in this Act limits or enlarges any right granted by express easement. When leaving a public access area, a person shall remove any refuse or tangible personal
property the person brought into the public access area.
jryoung
Well-known member
Means nothing in the long run without habitat and research.
Not according to the science.
RobG
Well-known member
I don't think coyotes help, but don't you mean that the money would be better spent on habitat, not predator control?
There is plenty of habitat and food in SD for deer.
Are you saying that if we increased the coyote population by 50%, the deer population would rise by 50%?
jryoung
Well-known member
No, 51%
