Elky Welky
Well-known member
Hunter Biden’s trial is interesting. To those not following, he was addicted to crack cocaine for a period of his life, and the prosecution is claiming that he lied on the ATF form when he declared that he did not use illegal drugs.
To my knowledge, he wasn’t convicted of possession or any other drug related crime at the time of the purchase.
Which leads to my question: if someone isn’t a convicted felon, but also uses illegal drugs, should they still have the right to keep and bear arms?
A reminder: marijuana also, for the purposes of that form, has been considered an illegal drug, even though it is legal in many states.
Should Mr. Biden be convicted, there would be grounds for a 2nd amendment challenge to this language on the form. Of course, those that are politically motivated won’t like the name attached to this case, but the 2nd amendment piece still strikes me as noteworthy and perhaps even precedent setting in the future, should he challenge the (what I believe to be inevitable) conviction for this crime.
Interested in the thoughts of the HT crowd.
To my knowledge, he wasn’t convicted of possession or any other drug related crime at the time of the purchase.
Which leads to my question: if someone isn’t a convicted felon, but also uses illegal drugs, should they still have the right to keep and bear arms?
A reminder: marijuana also, for the purposes of that form, has been considered an illegal drug, even though it is legal in many states.
Should Mr. Biden be convicted, there would be grounds for a 2nd amendment challenge to this language on the form. Of course, those that are politically motivated won’t like the name attached to this case, but the 2nd amendment piece still strikes me as noteworthy and perhaps even precedent setting in the future, should he challenge the (what I believe to be inevitable) conviction for this crime.
Interested in the thoughts of the HT crowd.