Straight Arrow
Well-known member
If intended, it would be an outstanding double entendre. However, I think just a misspelling, but still, yes, a classic.
Assault weapons ban advocated by a conservative
- Thread starter Big Fin
- Start date
If intended, it would be an outstanding double entendre. However, I think just a misspelling, but still, yes, a classic.
....saw that coming.
Glass house up here. A little bored tonight, POTUS told me I can't work tomorrow. It's either this or kick the dog.
So what I take from all of JC's rambling a is that he really has no idea what he is talking about thus changes the subject to mocking those he disagrees with. This is the reason we can't have a REAL conversation with democrats. I'm sure he would be on one of those death panels if he had the chance. He gets backed into a corner once again! "Umm, umm, errr..., death panel...Sarah Palin...old people." The fact remains that there is no easy solution to this mess. When the government threatens our freedoms in the slightest, we should ask the hard questions and not just roll over and give up our freedoms on a whim. Jose, if you honestly think you know what is best for all of us, then you would make the perfect democratic politician, you are definitely in the minority when it comes to many of these topics which leads me to believe that you are an Antigun nut or just like to press people's buttons due to your lack of maturity which should disqualify you from most grown up conversations. Go sit back down at the kids table and go back to school to get educated.
Democrats are good people. Jose is a left wing nut job and definitely ANTI-GUN and against anything sportsmen love. His comments are laughable and dam annoying. Go back to the MSNBC forum!
Its assault weapons now. Soon it will be sniper rifles with high power scopes, aka the Remington 700 and Nightforce scopes. The 700 is already a villain on MSNBC. You've all seen the lies from that waste of time.
The congresswomen in CA are already thinking, not out loud, but they are thinking it! Why do people need sniper rifles with scopes that can kill at 300 yards? Assault weapons now! Sniper rifles later! One by one until there are none! Right, nut job?
Its assault weapons now. Soon it will be sniper rifles with high power scopes, aka the Remington 700 and Nightforce scopes. The 700 is already a villain on MSNBC. You've all seen the lies from that waste of time.
The congresswomen in CA are already thinking, not out loud, but they are thinking it! Why do people need sniper rifles with scopes that can kill at 300 yards? Assault weapons now! Sniper rifles later! One by one until there are none! Right, nut job?
Last edited:
JoseCuervo
New member
First ballot nomination.
JoseCuervo
New member
FEMA camps and the UN? And you think the other side takes you seriously?
Straight Arrow
Well-known member
Clowns to the LEFT of me, Jokers to the RIGHT ... here I am stuck in the middle ....
JoseCuervo
New member
You gotta admit the crazy conspiracy theories are entertaining.
I am guessing the Mental Health restrictions are going to be a bitch for those who believe in FEMA camps and UN invaders.
Smh
Benfromalbuquerque
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,650
Been 10 1/2 years since this thread was touched. Partisan political division has increased along with the batshit conspiracies. Any meaningful regulation has come from state actions, not Federal. The Bruen case opened a door to all sorts of lawsuits that would not have been tangible prior to that decision. The linked article is findings (printed 2022 off earlier data) of 167 mass shootings over 50 years. 20% OF THAT TOTAL happened in the last five years of the study period. The gorilla (really handguns and assault rifles) in the room has intensified.
nij.ojp.gov
This is what I found most important in the article because nobody wants another school shooting:
“In cases involving K-12 school shootings, over 80% of individuals who engaged in shootings stole guns from family members.”
So it is our responsibility to police our own stuff. Lock and key, gun safe, trigger/action cables all work better than not even trying to secure the gun. Of what use is the firearm meant for “protection of my home and family” if someone uses it to kill children?
Public Mass Shootings: Database Amasses Details of a Half Century of U.S. Mass Shootings with Firearms, Generating Psychosocial Histories
Persons who committed public mass shootings in the U.S. over the last half century were commonly troubled by personal trauma before their shooting incidents, nearly always in a state of crisis at the time, and, in most cases, engaged in leaking their plans before opening fire. Most were insiders...
nij.ojp.gov
This is what I found most important in the article because nobody wants another school shooting:
“In cases involving K-12 school shootings, over 80% of individuals who engaged in shootings stole guns from family members.”
So it is our responsibility to police our own stuff. Lock and key, gun safe, trigger/action cables all work better than not even trying to secure the gun. Of what use is the firearm meant for “protection of my home and family” if someone uses it to kill children?
That is hilarious! So apparently these "rules" didn't apply to those conservative supreme court judges and their views on Roe vs Wade?
noharleyyet
Well-known member
You would've been the rising star in Jose's mean girl club...GD California Commies
User Clip: 1989 Reagan condemns Assault Weapons
In a post-presidential address at USC, Reagan says AK-47s are not necessary for self-defense or sporting. (41:40 - 43:35)www.c-span.org
Hopefully it will be another 11 years before we have to hear from you again.
noharleyyet
Well-known member
You mad?Hopefully it will be another 11 years before we have to hear from you again.
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
noharleyyet
Well-known member
I shart you not . . .
Benfromalbuquerque
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,650
Honorable Thomas and the Mrs. Thomas are busy re-writing all standards of acceptable behavior.
