Flaming Communist. I think MTG is on to his schtick.Gospel of Luke 10:25-35 would make for good reading for policy makers. Was he liberal or conservative?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flaming Communist. I think MTG is on to his schtick.Gospel of Luke 10:25-35 would make for good reading for policy makers. Was he liberal or conservative?
Yes.Are we really that desperate?
There’s a lot of hyperbole in this. I’ve lived in some very right wing, conservative places that had the same problems with prosecution of crime and funding of schools and infrastructure as any more left leaning places.I agree it is people. But people make policies that encourage folks to be dependent on government handouts, disincentivize working for a living, crazy high taxes, discourage prosecuting of criminals, encouraging illegal entry, defunding the police, etc....
Wonder if increasing the number of people into a concentrated area and reducing the number of police in that area would have any correlation on crime?In any instance where you have the movement of people into a concentrated area, you will see an increase in crime. That's simply a function of humanity crowding together. New York City leading up to the Civil War was a hot mess of gang activity based on right wing intolerance of immigrants & black folk (draft riots, etc) followed by the immigration of organized crime from the old world in the 1880's & 90's with the Black Hand which turned into Cosa Nostra. Chicago during prohibition was a direct result of outlawing liquor, a cause that was championed by religious conservatives who over-reacted to a serious public health issue. Denver had serious gang issues before it exploded in the 2000's. Austin has been a drug town since UT was founded. In fact, the first mass shooting happened at UT.
The whiskey rebellion was an attempt to avoid taxation of liquor. George Washington shut that down. THe opium trade in the west was tied to railroads & mining, as was the massive explosion of prostitution and murder.
It's not necessarily political. It's the American psyche to thrive on conflict
True......I was talking about the article and CO specifically. It is not exclusive but the shitshows are quite a bit different given the permanent population/political shift vs semi transitory nature of the Bakken.Um, Bakken was most certainly not an influx of liberals and it was a complete shitshow.
Nah, it's simply a people phenomenon.Wonder if increasing the number of people into a concentrated area and reducing the number of police in that area would have any correlation on crime?
Wonder if increasing the number of people into a concentrated area and reducing the number of police in that area would have any correlation on crime?
Let’s just assume everything there is accurate for a moment.I agree it is people. But people make policies that encourage folks to be dependent on government handouts, disincentivize working for a living, crazy high taxes, discourage prosecuting of criminals, encouraging illegal entry, defunding the police, etc....
Maybe rural Montana shouldn’t be so liberal if it wants to combat the last two decades of meth.I think we can look at the failures of Portland & Seattle relative to the defund issue and rightly claim liberal failures of policy. But what does that mean for solidly conservative areas in rural states that are suffering from opiod and meth crises & dramatic rises in violent crime?
Damned kids…..Please explain:
OMG -Better solution: 90% of all lift tickets are for locals only. 10% for the NR assholes.
If you're saying Colorado has seen a 'shift in politics' in 12 years, thats a non-starter. How many R governors have we elected in the last 50 years?So the shift in politics in those areas (relating DIRECTLY to influx of folks for the described locations) correlating directly to soaring crime, pollution, cost of living and housing are totally unrelated.....riiiiiiiiight. SMFH
I’m just mad that Colorado had more out migrants to MT than it took from MT.Now I'm pissed at @LWC55 for bringing William's graphs out. Uncalled for man.
OMG -
"You draw your Steamboat tag this year?"
"No way brah, point creep killed Steamboat, I only put in for late March Tuesdays at Eldora and then pick up leftovers for Howelsen and throw a few bucks at the Raffle for Copper Mt weekend days"
Sadly - some flavor of that is not out of the question in my lifetime.
Maybe rural Montana shouldn’t be so liberal if it wants to combat the last two decades of meth.
Why can’t more states be like Arkansas and WV?
It means drugs and crime don't discriminate by what color state you live. Especially in poorer areas. And I don't think conservatives have all the answers. But I do know that the more power we give to the government directly correlates to less power to the citizens. And I like citizens more than bureaucrats.I think we can look at the failures of Portland & Seattle relative to the defund issue and rightly claim liberal failures of policy. But what does that mean for solidly conservative areas in rural states that are suffering from opiod and meth crises & dramatic rises in violent crime?
It means drugs and crime don't discriminate by what color state you live. Especially in poorer areas. And I don't think conservatives have all the answers. But I do know that the more power we give to the government directly correlates to less power to the citizens. And I like citizens more than bureaucrats.