SAJ-99
Well-known member
Do you have the source on this info? "And we never produced more oil and natural gas than we have under Biden."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have the source on this info? "And we never produced more oil and natural gas than we have under Biden."
Do you have the source on this info? "And we never produced more oil and natural gas than we have under Biden."
I don't know where you come up with this stuff.I often try to use historical comparisons with folks who just don't understand the reality of taxes and where we are. "How would you like to go back to the tax rates we had under Reagan?"
Reality-they were much HIGHER under Reagan, especially on the truly wealthy!
I figure Trumps pick and then his tariff announcement are an example of what we will see in markets--again. WILD fluctuation, high volatility. The pick was loved by the markets which then headed down sharply after his tariff announcement. Just needs to keep his mouth shut but we all know that's an impossible task. Taxes will be interesting--his tax cuts expire and they led to a sharp increase in the national debt--continuing them and increasing any of them--which he is widely expected to do--greatly ramp up the debt. Best way to start easing the debt is to let them expire but that won't happen.
I often try to use historical comparisons with folks who just don't understand the reality of taxes and where we are. "How would you like to go back to the tax rates we had under Reagan?"
Reality-they were much HIGHER under Reagan, especially on the truly wealthy!
The market isn't taking him seriously. It just isn't. Is it maybe overly optimistic to the point of complacency? maybe. We will know soon. Right now he is just seeking attention.I figure Trumps pick and then his tariff announcement are an example of what we will see in markets--again. WILD fluctuation, high volatility. The pick was loved by the markets which then headed down sharply after his tariff announcement. Just needs to keep his mouth shut but we all know that's an impossible task. Taxes will be interesting--his tax cuts expire and they led to a sharp increase in the national debt--continuing them and increasing any of them--which he is widely expected to do--greatly ramp up the debt. Best way to start easing the debt is to let them expire but that won't happen.
I often try to use historical comparisons with folks who just don't understand the reality of taxes and where we are. "How would you like to go back to the tax rates we had under Reagan?"
Reality-they were much HIGHER under Reagan, especially on the truly wealthy!
Some people drank bleach...The market isn't taking him seriously.
It would be interesting to see that, it didn't work out for Biden so well.. I am sure absolutely zero could change and he could convince a lot of people the economy is great and it is all because of him
@SAJ-99 you serious?You have to admit that Trump is a master at controlling the messaging (and democrats absolutely suck at it).
One thing is for certain, I don't think we the people have improved on our understanding of taxes cuts since 1986.
"At the time, people weren't substantially informed about the tax cuts, as an ABC News Poll in September 1986 showed that 63% of Americans didn't know enough about the Tax Reform Act of 1986 to say if it was good or bad.[3]"
Yeah. But those talking points absolutely sucked!
You can looks this stuff up.U.S. Federal Government Tax Revenue
The federal government generates tax revenue through sources like income and corporate taxes. Learn how much tax revenue the U.S. generates each year.www.thebalancemoney.com
Show me where the federal government had a decrease in revenues?
Like I said, Democrats are horrible at it.It would be interesting to see that, it didn't work out for Biden so well.
Yep. Completely serious. It won't be accepted by anyone parroting "liberal media bias", but comparing how Trump I admin controlled messaging and Biden admin controlled messaging it is clear there is no comparison. Trump is a master of the media, and the media (any and all) loves him because he brings views. Any claim of bias is made against those that point out his BS. Even Fox took hits from him. The reality is that Americans get most of their information from places that aren't even media.
Point taken but pointing out biased media BS is also a fact.You can looks this stuff up.
Total Treasury revenue
2016 $4.27T
2017 $4.24T
2018 $4.16T
Like I said, Democrats are horrible at it.
Yep. Completely serious. It won't be accepted by anyone parroting "liberal media bias", but comparing how Trump I admin controlled messaging and Biden admin controlled messaging it is clear there is no comparison. Trump is a master of the media, and the media (any and all) loves him because he brings views. Any claim of bias is made against those that point out his BS. Even Fox took hits from him. The reality is that Americans get most of their information from places that aren't even media.
Maybe. Perception is reality for most people.Point taken but pointing out biased media BS is also a fact.
Like total treasury revenue was up 7% in 2019? Guess it depends on who is reporting the whole story.Maybe. Perception is reality for most people.
A for effort.Like I said, Democrats are horrible at it.
No argument from me on that. But that wasn’t the question. The amount of money goes up every year. It’s called inflation. He just wanted proof that tax revenues collected went down.Hopefully he is satisfied. Obviously you are not, but that isn’t a surprise. Again.Like total treasury revenue was up 7% in 2019? Guess it depends on who is reporting the whole story.
Based on this source, the years you reported down, were actually up slightly. They did go down in 2020 and 2023.No argument from me on that. But that wasn’t the question. The amount of money goes up every year. It’s called inflation. He just wanted proof that tax revenues collected went down.Hopefully he is satisfied. Obviously you are not, but that isn’t a surprise. Again.