Muley Freak in trouble?

[Whiskey Freak]

 

[Whiskey Freak]

Notice the motion for gag order!

 

[JLS]

Notice the motion for gag order!

Saw that. If he gets told to STFU, is that an infringement on his First Amendment rights?

 

[Derek44]

Saw that. If he gets told to STFU, is that an infringement on his First Amendment rights?

 

[Derek44]

Totally reminds me of the phone scams you get warned of where they say that the perp will just try to get you to say “yes” to anything, then dub your response to any questions after the fact.

 

[Cleared Hot]

Totally reminds me of the phone scams you get warned of where they say that the perp will just try to get you to say “yes” to anything, then dub your response to any questions after the fact.

That's pretty close to what they did, but they didn't even use the landowners voice. They just recorded their in-house tech saying "Yeah" untill it sounded close and then dubbed it in when ever Erik asked a question he fabricated to save his ass.

 

[rogerthat]

That's pretty close to what they did, but they didn't even use the landowners voice. They just recorded their in-house tech saying "Yeah" untill it sounded close and then dubbed it in when ever Erik asked a question he fabricated to save his ass.

Wow. The plot thickens. If this is true, I hope Erik the freak is done hunting forever. That’s some shady unethical crap. Fraudulent comes to mind

 

[OntarioHunter]

Gag order? Whose motion? Can't be the prosecutor. Vanderdouche is only shooting himself in the foot. Why shut him up? Maybe the defense lawyer is trying to shut him up. Man, this just keeps getting more bizarre.

 

[WapitiBob]

That's pretty close to what they did, but they didn't even use the landowners voice. They just recorded their in-house tech saying "Yeah" untill it sounded close and then dubbed it in when ever Erik asked a question he fabricated to save his ass.

If that's the case, where's the cease and desist order from the LO's attorney?

 

[jt13]

I'd be amazed if this guy was dumb enough to fabricate video. Forensic analysis would sort that out pretty quick and result in a plethora of charges much more serious than trespassing.

 

[Cleared Hot]

Go watch the 2 videos he put out on the muley freak IG if you haven't.

He mentions something about telling the landowner to have his nephew text him so they could coordinate hunting
on the opener. Maybe Erik pissed off the nephew? His arraignment is tomorrow.

The landowners nephew wasn't even involved. The landowners nephews boy is Erik's camera guy, who was previously told that he was no longer welcome on the property. So that has definitely been fabricated by Erik. When the landowner caught Erik coming off the mountain with the deer and confronted him about trespassing Erik said but I have your nephew with me and the landowner said which one? Eric said Payton, and the landowner said I don't have a nephew named Payton. Erik then offered the landowner $5,000 if he would let him go. So it sounds like he wanted to pay the landowner $5,000 to get permission after he trespassed and poached the deer. Okay, I think I got it, that's why they keep saying he had permission.

 

[Carl 9.3x62]

The landowners nephew wasn't even involved. The landowners nephews boy is Erik's camera guy, who was previously told that he was no longer welcome on the property. So that has definitely been fabricated by Erik. When the landowner caught Erik coming off the mountain with the deer and confronted him about trespassing Erik said but I have your nephew with me and the landowner said which one? Eric said Payton, and the landowner said I don't have a nephew named Payton. Erik then offered the landowner $5,000 if he would let him go. So it sounds like he wanted to pay the landowner $5,000 to get permission after he trespassed and poached the deer. Okay, I think I got it, that's why they keep saying he had permission.

Who are you that you come out of nowhere as an expert on this subject?

 

[Hilljackoutlaw]

If all this is true stuff. It's gonna be on dateline with....

 

[Cleared Hot]

Who are you that you come out of nowhere as an expert on this subject?

Expert.....no everything I comment on is straight from people that were actually on the mountain that day. Would not of needed to say anything but the Freaks and their posted video's for some reason are leaving out some of the best parts. I'm sure they just forgot, common oversite, you can't expect them to remember everything. Just trying to help them out in their diligent quest for the truth.

 

[more_cowbell]

There was a motion but don’t see where an order was issued either granting or denying.

Also seems like a lot of posting of allegations may affect the potential jury pool. Or maybe not who knows

 

[JLS]

There was a motion but don’t see where an order was issued either granting or denying.

Also seems like a lot of posting of allegations may affect the potential jury pool. Or maybe not who knows

Might be trying to weasel into a change of venue.

 

[The Hedgehog]

everything I comment on is straight from people that were actually on the mountain that day.

“Mountain”? Don’t you mean ag field?

I think it’s just a big group of clowns trying to get more social media $ off something really stupid.

 

[more_cowbell]

If all this is true stuff. It's gonna be on dateline with....

View attachment 268989

Gag order? Whose motion? Can't be the prosecutor. Vanderdouche is only shooting himself in the foot. Why shut him up? Maybe the defense lawyer is trying to shut him up. Man, this just keeps getting more bizarre.

Or maybe “something is afoot in the wind” to influence potential jury members. During jury selection if people admit to having read a bunch of stuff online about this, and have to disclose what they read and whether it has given them an opinion on the issue one way or another, then I think that coukd DQ them from being on jury.

 

[more_cowbell]

Might be trying to weasel into a change of venue.

If there aren’t enough potential jurors in Oneida who’ve not been influenced then maybe procedure to transfer somewhere else you’re right

 

[JLS]

Or maybe “something is afoot in the wind” to influence potential jury members. During jury selection if people admit to having read a bunch of stuff online about this, and have to disclose what they read and whether it has given them an opinion on the issue one way or another, then I think that coukd DQ them from being on jury.

Hence the motion for gag order. Time to STFU and let things go through the legal process.