No. They weren't easily shared.As to this point - i think thats generational.
Would you have said the same thing about kodak pictures in the 80s? Or whenever they came out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. They weren't easily shared.As to this point - i think thats generational.
Would you have said the same thing about kodak pictures in the 80s? Or whenever they came out?
They were/are more sharable than memories. We just escalated with technology.No. They weren't easily shared.
If you value being on hunt talk at all, I would caution you on calling it as it is. Wild times we live in.Your draw odds keep getting worse, there’s more hunters in your favorite spots and on the landscape than ever before, the forkys can’t make it to 3, most of these hunters wouldn’t hunt if they couldn’t make videos or post to social media, but @Forkyfinder doesn't care, doesn’t affect him
Frankly, I had no idea buzz said that:
I agree generally for your specific areas. Has leasing, hunting clubs, outfitter leasing increased or decreased? How about ATV use? Trail cams?
The 30K foot view, which I tend to base my observations on, is that things have not changed for the better. I also only provided a partial list of things that have caused the issues being discussed.
Do you think being able to apply for tags in about 2-3 minutes via the 'net has any kind of impact? You certainly remember the days of requesting an application booklet, having to front the money, and fill out a paper application.
The thing I absolutely agree with you on, is that hunters will not police themselves. As far as wildlife managers, if they are allowed to operate without the political "over-sight" some can be trusted to do the right thing. Problem is, they get pressure from a few landowners, their legislators and politically appointed Director to make decisions NOT in the best interest of the hunting public or wildlife.
This doesn't have to be the case, but hunter apathy and a lack of people willing to put in even miniscule effort into supporting their biologists and having their backs when poor decisions are handed down from on high, leaves us where we are.
Hunters don't work to oust the clowns making bad calls, they systematically vote them in to office over and over and over again. They do the same things and expect different results, there's a term for that.
Too few folks out there working on behalf of wildlife, habitat, and public lands to compete with the other influences working against all of that as well as hunting.
Until that changes, we're going to continue with being forced to just stop the worst of it and will likely lose ground. Takes money, takes time, and effort and most hunters won't contribute to any of it.
Wish it were different, but that's the reality.
To add to this, the ability to use the internet to apply, in about 2-3 minutes per state, and to do so with only an application fee and associated plastic credit card has caused a spike as well.
Was a whole different deal 25-30 years ago when you had to submit via mail or phone call a a request for an application booklet. To know what area's to apply for you had to either have a good network of NR friends or make a bunch of phone calls. Then you had to march down to the bank, get a cashiers check for the entire tag fee, fill out a paper application, put a stamp on it and pray it got there in time. When I first starting applying all over, about 25 years ago, it wasn't uncommon for my wife and I to have $18-$20K out there rolling around in various drawings. Now? Maybe a grand or two.
Now you can wait until the last minute, see what other tags you draw or don't draw, do all of it via the net never having to know a thing or talk to anyone.
IMO, that has increased applicant numbers more than anything, the agencies have made it simple to apply all over the place.
I liked when you first got on HuntTalk all fresh with all your own thoughts and opinions and ready to show off your muley and even though I didn’t agree with a lot of the things you had to say, at least you were true to yourself and it was fun watching you go against the grain naively on a lot of topics regarding hunting quietly, grazing public lands, etc.As to this point - i think thats generational.
Would you have said the same thing about kodak pictures in the 80s? Or whenever they came out?
Imagine having that kind of money and willingly choosing to have neighbors.It's ok to be jealous, that's a nice house-not too big or too small, nice kitchen, good garage, nice location, tastefully decorated, I approve
Imagine having that kind of money and willingly choosing to have neighbors.
Making Hunting tax deductible business expenses.I saw this big a$$ dually truck on the side of the road yesterday. ATV in the bed, lime green skins proclaiming xxx outdoors.com on the side. "Follow us on YouTube!" The guy beside the truck was at least two of me, and that is saying a lot. If he can find a tree stand that will hold him, he should definitely go for a sponsorship.
The red beard and Utah plate really sold it. I was a little confused because there are no private ranch 360 class bulls within 200 miles.
“Heck” is edited out, meme must’ve originated in Utah lol
Light bulb moment!!!!Making Hunting tax deductible business expenses.
I added the "Heck" to cover a different word. Lol“Heck” is edited out, meme must’ve originated in Utah lol
I was surprised not to see Steve Rinella in that warehouseOn the lighter side of, "Influencers", here is the notorious Ozzie Man himself! He has a series worth the laughs named, "Destination F#@ked"! 3-5 minute short laughs though for sake of the thread title, though you'd enjoy. Rated PG-13 language.