CPW Commission updating 80/20 allocation

Both in-person (yes, two total commenters in-person) commenters are current/former outfitters doing their part to make sure nonresidents, and their outfitters, get as many tags as possible.

Both: "Please consider the financial impact on CPW". What a useless argument. The decrease in revenue is tiny and won't make a bit of difference to CPW's massive budget.
 
Saying comparing ourselves to other western states is an invalid argument is an opinion not a fact. I therefore assert that argument is also invalid.

Whether or not it goes in the trash I will spam the hell out of Dallas may and several others on that point.
 
That CPW commission is an outfitter owned group of rednecks.

I found myself cheering for them to find their next words. I was typically able to rework the sentence myself to make it coherent.

Looking at their bios, I was expecting more polish. Although the bios made it clear they don't understand western hunting.

But as an NR, I guess I should be grateful that your commission is incompetent?
 
Advertisement

Forum statistics

Threads
114,046
Messages
2,042,263
Members
36,442
Latest member
Grendelhunter98
Back
Top