ida homer
Well-known member
Cut out the NR and there will be an impact.
Yah ask Idaho how that has panned out for them in regards to that 10% cap and not giving NR's their stupid point. The department is hurtin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cut out the NR and there will be an impact.
Yah ask Idaho how that has panned out for them in regards to that 10% cap and not giving NR's their stupid point. The department is hurtin.
Welp, at least my easy draw antelope hunts would remain intact. There's always plenty of leftover resident tags that flow over to the NR pool since it seems like the residents don't even get tags where I hunt.
And I'd be dumping my deer points and would just hunt dinks in the turd general units, if I'd even bother with deer at all.
Elk, I'd be dumping my points as well. General tags and cow hunts would be the extent of my WY elk hunting if I even go at all.
For me personally, WY is my go-to opportunity state. When I plan a hunting trip out west, WY is always the first place I consider. I'm going back for my 5th year in a row this fall. I've never scoffed at the tag prices, and likely wouldn't if they raised them if they're needed. But limiting NR opportunity for the above 3 species would have me looking elsewhere when I plan hunts. I spend a lot of money in WY when I go...hotels, butchers, taxidermists, restaurants, bars, gas, grocery stores. When 4 of us flatlanders load up the truck and head to WY for 9 days, we bring a fair amount of economic stimulation with us.
I also know, for a fact, that the outfitter lobby is behind the 60-40 split increase to Special Fee's VS. Random. Through the grape-vine I heard the outfitter lobby really just wants to "settle" for a 50-50 split on that issue.
Why is tag allocation a sacred cow that should never be touched?