Way nicer than my less than quarter acre lot I paid for261,000 lease - 27 acre ranch site = .01%. Seems very reasonable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way nicer than my less than quarter acre lot I paid for261,000 lease - 27 acre ranch site = .01%. Seems very reasonable.
What is your threshold oo?261,000 lease - 27 acre ranch site = .01%. Seems very reasonable.
What is your threshold MM? Also your threshold 3.2M acre monuments created by Antiquities Act?What is your threshold oo?
I may misunderstand you, but I’m assuming that you’re saying that putting up a 27acre set of pens a two trailer houses is a reasonable base of operations for a 261,000 acre lease. I tend to agree. Some of the responses seem to be responses to something else, so I’m a little confused.261,000 lease - 27 acre ranch site = .01%. Seems very reasonable.
So just like me, you’re not aware of anything at all that the Johnsons have done wrong.Just in the sense they are paying nothing, in todays market for the leases. And from my perspective most of these " We have 27, 320, 640 acres of deeded lands and they have thousands of acres of leases" is usually suspect of the "ownership" of said leases.
I admit I have not looked into the Johnsons plight in depth.
There are thousands of acres of similar US lands claimed by homesteaders,ranchers ,etc around here that were never listed in the original homestead plates. I have FS maps that show the land as FS in the 1900-20 period. Not in the layout for homesteads. Now the land is all big ranches that wound up owning FS lands.
The Bears Ears was taken from the natives. It was not settled in a way most folks would call legal nowadays, even a Mormon lawyer would have a hard sell...
There is a ranch down the draw for sale. $15 mil for 20,000 acres it says in the ad. The ranch is 9,000 acres of deeded lands and the rest state & BLM leases the family has had locked up like they own it. Nice folks ,but lots of lawyers and judges in that family. They all live elsewhere too.
I don’t think anyone should be setting up residence on public land. If you want to argue AA, do a thread search.What is your threshold MM? Also your threshold 3.2M acre monuments created by Antiquities Act?
Grazing Homestead Act 1916-1976 could have allowed 640 acres if the original rancher or his predecessors since the 1880's had filed. I feel the BLM should grandfather the 27 acres with easement preventing any use except ranching.I don’t think anyone should be setting up residence on public land. If you want to argue AA, do a thread search.
Cool, post some random shit that has nothing to do with the discussion....interesting.Grazing Homestead Act 1916-1976 could have allowed 640 acres if the original rancher or his predecessors since the 1880's had filed. I feel the BLM should grandfather the 27 acres with easement preventing any use except ranching.
My buddies dads place on the Hi-Line had buffalo jump, teepee circles and other native artifacts. MT, WY and Dakotas have extensive native and prehistoric artifacts and 1980 SCOTUS ruled US Gov did not fairly compensate Sioux Nations for Black Hills. Perhaps Nov 2023 Biden will declare Northern Great Plains National Monument across FS, BLM lands in these states using AA.
Maybe he will? The white bluffs monument is sure a terrible place.Perhaps Nov 2023 Biden will declare Northern Great Plains National Monument across FS, BLM lands in these states using AA.
NIMBY is thing.Cool, post some random shit that has nothing to do with the discussion....interesting.
You should write a letter to the BLM and let them know about your "feelings".
By "teepee circles" I assume you are referring to tepee rings. I have been around a few hundred, but cool that you know a guy.
View attachment 254859
Yes, and often it's a warranted objection ... especially here in Montana, but elsewhere also. If it were something objectionable in Utah, we Montanans would also be saying NIYBY!NIMBY is thing.