And the goalposts move yet again. I have to hand it to you, you are an incredible mental gymnast.Meh...restrictions on firearms were a favorite of the R's in my lifetime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the goalposts move yet again. I have to hand it to you, you are an incredible mental gymnast.Meh...restrictions on firearms were a favorite of the R's in my lifetime.
Your heros have always been gun control advocates, not my problem. That's on you.And the goalposts move yet again. I have to hand it to you, you are an incredible mental gymnast.
Very little recently.Right, and how much success have D's had in taking your firearms away?
Really? who are my heroes?Your heros have always been gun control advocates, not my problem. That's on you.
If you can't comprehend and understand the difference between a constitutional amendment and rights protected under same, versus something not codified in federal law, I can understand why you make that lame comparison.Very little recently.
Do you think if there were a legislative super majority for D (state/federal) or a major philosophy change in court ruligs - it would change?
I do. We just saw it with abortion law - just like you said.
I understand the difference.If you can't comprehend and understand the difference between a constitutional amendment and rights protected under same, versus something not codified in federal law, I can understand why you make that lame comparison.
Try remedial civics, good place to start.
It most certainly does.That doesnt really affect what could/would happen.
How exactly did roe vs wade become the law of the land?It most certainly does.
Once again, constitutional amendment VS law/ Supreme Court ruling.How exactly did roe vs wade become the law of the land?
Plenty of progressives believe in more limitations on the 2A.
I get that.Once again, constitutional amendment VS law/ Supreme Court ruling.
One is not like the other, if only obviously.
Google is your friend on how roe v. wade became "law of the land". You may want to brush up on what a law is.
And $300/hr to testifyNot for $150/hr he doesn’t
NopeIt became “law” unlawfully, which is reason for overturning.
If it was legal then why the overturn? The govt overstepped states rights when roe v. wade first was passed.Nope
Buzz, again we agree on something. I tend to think of it as “unlawfully passed”, but interpretation and perception tend to cloud vision.If it was legal then why the overturn? The govt overstepped states rights when roe v. wade first was passed.
It's HT. Everyone saw it coming.How far into the weeds can a thread get, a political hit piece on the Gov to debating how roe v. wade became law to being overturned.
I don’t think anybody could’ve seen this coming.