noharleyyet
Well-known member
Have you read enough to annoint a protagonist..I been reading mostly the posts of posters doing the raking and I have hard time commiserating with them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you read enough to annoint a protagonist..I been reading mostly the posts of posters doing the raking and I have hard time commiserating with them.
If Busse is a turncoat and Hossblur’s post helps him sell more books does that make Hossblur a turncoat too?Mine should be here Thursday. Busse's raking over the coals might have boosted sales.
I went to private school, my hands are still bruised. I have the whole book (thread) report already written.Have you read enough to annoint a protagonist..
Brown-nosing will get you nowhere.about the only post in this entire thread I give fair, objective value is Randy's.
If Busse is a turncoat and Hossblur’s post helps him sell more books does that make Hossblur a turncoat too?
Not that I consider Busse an, "enemy", though I find identifying opposition strengths and weakness as a premium value. Those who support his beliefs, cheers.
I have his audiobook version. 10 hr listen.
Personally, I may strongly disagree with Busse though a favorite speech comes to mind by Theodore Roosevelt as I view what he says as his reasons for his path and about the only post in this entire thread I give fair, objective value is Randy's.
I've met Busse and take him as a man of conviction. (I feel i have a pretty good initial read of a person) Misgiided by emotion and new vaulted empowerment by his connection to the Biden/Gifford fame train.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
No, simply shows the genius.
Nothing gives a anti gun crusader more street cred with the left, than best seller on NY Times.
How?. mtmuleyYour'e too modest. On this board, you've helped bolster his credibility, more than you know.
Oh, I know.Your'e too modest. On this board, you've helped bolster his credibility, more than you know.
Emotion and fear drives the anti gun effort and no one successfully argues the necessity to modify human behavior rather than restrict guns.
The second amendment isn’t about hunting.
This is predicated on @shrapnel 's comment. Democrats desire more regulation. Thus people buy more firearms.It would be easy to argue that the pro gun culture is similarly driven. Just look at gun and ammo sales during the Obama presidency.
Every time i hear someone say "gun show loophole" it makes me think they either don't know anything about gun laws or they are being intentionally misleading.
Government regulation and modification of human behavior?One point that many fail to consider is that a gun made in 1885 or 1911 hasn’t changed since it was designed, yet all the regulations that have since been imposed, still don’t change human behavior.
Too many people are trying to regulate the wrong thing. Guns haven’t changed and still the perception of more regulation being the solution continues to persist.
Emotion and fear drives the anti gun effort and no one successfully argues the necessity to modify human behavior rather than restrict guns.
The second amendment isn’t about hunting.
One point that many fail to consider is that a gun made in 1885 or 1911 hasn’t changed since it was designed, yet all the regulations that have since been imposed, still don’t change human behavior.
Too many people are trying to regulate the wrong thing. Guns haven’t changed and still the perception of more regulation being the solution continues to persist.
@Sytes regardless of where that ad was placed, it is part of the issue at hand: the fetishizing of dystopian and authoritarian principles over public service. I am 100% in support of police and think they need these kinds of tools in order to meet the current threats of today, which are heavily armed and organized. But given all that's going on in our nation, maybe taking a step back from this kind of testosterone fueled romanticism is needed at least in the marketing space.
The advertisement you selected is pre 2005. 17+ years ago.
It makes me think that we're blindly ignoring the guy at the show with a table full of firearms and parts that is just a "collector" with an LLC who's selling & trading without an FFL, or that we pretend like there aren't deals being made on the side or in the parking lot. I picked up a S&W M39 that way.