D
Deleted member 16014
Guest
I said it wasn't directed at you specifically, which I meant; it was intended to be a rhetorical counterpoint to something like a free for all. Since you directed a question to me I'm happy to answer.So a persons POV is 100% "right" for everyone else to follow? Seriously? Where do you want to start? Electronics? Long range hunting? Bullets? Archery? Crossbows? ATV's? E-Bikes? You hunt your way, I will hunt mine.
There is only one POV that is right and hopefully I will meet him some day.
Yes it is our right and maybe even obligation -- if endowed with some technical knowledge about wildlife, habitat, and hunting methods -- to form opinions and advocate policies around perceived best practices. These take the form of hunting regulations, land use plans, road closures (or not), etc. that are managed by various entities. I comment and engage in regulatory processes associated with those things based on my knowledge and experience.
For example, a few years ago I commented in favor of a measure to disallowing people from selling coordinates to specific animals because I believe that it cheapens the resource, and doesn't account for the value of learning the habitat, game animal, and investment in that process. I'm sure there were people who commented to the contrary. Of course I felt like I was "right" on that topic, or I wouldn't have supported the proposal.
If your point is that there are some things best left up to the individual hunter, I would agree. If your point is that people shouldn't develop informed opinions about the use of hunting technologies, modes of travel, hunting season structure, etc., and convey those as appropriate, then I disagree.