MT Legislature - Week 4

I am careful not to spend too much time posting on these Montans specific issues, as I don't want people to think that Hunt Talk is a Montana forum. The value I see in this stuff being posted about Montana is that whether you are involved, or not, this same stuff is going on in your legislature, no matter where you live.

It just so happens that I have been involved in this for 20 years, and am one of the more outspoken people. As such, I am often asked to testify. I am sure some of you are the same for your areas.

The point to take from all of this is that as hunting is continually under attack, we can no longer just buy a license and call it good. We have to belong to conservation and hunting groups. We have to be actively involved in those groups.

And, no matter where we live, we have to be invovled in the politics of hunting. The time has come where being politically involved is as much a responsibility as practicing marksmanship, or the many other things required of a hunter. Sitting idly by, in the political climate of our day, is no longer an option. Apathy is our enemy.

Hunters have built a conservation miracle that is the success of the world. Others now see the value in what we have created and they will use all power necessary to appoint it, direct it, and usurp it for the benefit of their group.

This is an inside view of what it is, and how it unfolds. Nothing tasteful about it. It makes for difficult conversations and you lose business and relationships in the process.

As one very important person, who in the face of strong opposition, once said of our wildlife and wild places.

"Wildlife cannot speak for itself…so we must and we will.” ......... President Theodore Roosevelt

Which is why his face so rightfully belongs on Mount Rushmore, while his detractors failed to make a grain of difference as they kicked and screamed about every measure taken by TR to protect our wildlife and wild resources, and in the process, he increased the public estate for hunters by 200 million acres.

We need another Theodore Roosevelt.
 
BigFin,

Thanks for taking the time to deal with the legislature...what a joke its become.

I'm absolutely shocked at the amount of bills to come out of this session in MT...maybe a good thrashing this year will slow them down.
 
I am careful not to spend too much time posting on these Montans specific issues, as I don't want people to think that Hunt Talk is a Montana forum. The value I see in this stuff being posted about Montana is that whether you are involved, or not, this same stuff is going on in your legislature, no matter where you live.

It just so happens that I have been involved in this for 20 years, and am one of the more outspoken people. As such, I am often asked to testify. I am sure some of you are the same for your areas.

The point to take from all of this is that as hunting is continually under attack, we can no longer just buy a license and call it good. We have to belong to conservation and hunting groups. We have to be actively involved in those groups.

And, no matter where we live, we have to be invovled in the politics of hunting. The time has come where being politically involved is as much a responsibility as practicing marksmanship, or the many other things required of a hunter. Sitting idly by, in the political climate of our day, is no longer an option. Apathy is our enemy.

Hunters have built a conservation miracle that is the success of the world. Others now see the value in what we have created and they will use all power necessary to appoint it, direct it, and usurp it for the benefit of their group.

This is an inside view of what it is, and how it unfolds. Nothing tasteful about it. It makes for difficult conversations and you lose business and relationships in the process.

As one very important person, who in the face of strong opposition, once said of our wildlife and wild places.



Which is why his face so rightfully belongs on Mount Rushmore, while his detractors failed to make a grain of difference as they kicked and screamed about every measure taken by TR to protect our wildlife and wild resources, and in the process, he increased the public estate for hunters by 200 million acres.

We need another Theodore Roosevelt.

Great post Fin.
 
I am careful not to spend too much time posting on these Montans specific issues, as I don't want people to think that Hunt Talk is a Montana forum. The value I see in this stuff being posted about Montana is that whether you are involved, or not, this same stuff is going on in your legislature, no matter where you live.

It just so happens that I have been involved in this for 20 years, and am one of the more outspoken people. As such, I am often asked to testify. I am sure some of you are the same for your areas.

The point to take from all of this is that as hunting is continually under attack, we can no longer just buy a license and call it good. We have to belong to conservation and hunting groups. We have to be actively involved in those groups.

And, no matter where we live, we have to be invovled in the politics of hunting. The time has come where being politically involved is as much a responsibility as practicing marksmanship, or the many other things required of a hunter. Sitting idly by, in the political climate of our day, is no longer an option. Apathy is our enemy.

Hunters have built a conservation miracle that is the success of the world. Others now see the value in what we have created and they will use all power necessary to appoint it, direct it, and usurp it for the benefit of their group.

This is an inside view of what it is, and how it unfolds. Nothing tasteful about it. It makes for difficult conversations and you lose business and relationships in the process.

As one very important person, who in the face of strong opposition, once said of our wildlife and wild places.



Which is why his face so rightfully belongs on Mount Rushmore, while his detractors failed to make a grain of difference as they kicked and screamed about every measure taken by TR to protect our wildlife and wild resources, and in the process, he increased the public estate for hunters by 200 million acres.

We need another Theodore Roosevelt.

I think we found one. Fantastic post Randy.
 
Go figure - republicans sweep the elections and now we have an unprecedented number of anti-sportsman bills. I got the below email regarding another bill. Since i use the stream access law for fishing and also hunting access to public lands im against this bill.

______email below______
URGENT!!! WE NEED YOUR QUICK AND EMPHATIC MESSAGES OPPOSING HB309, THE DITCH BILL!!! Please write your Montana House Representative TODAY and tell him or her to vote AGAINST HB 309, a bill sponsored by Rep. Jeff Wellborn (R-Dillon) that would severely weaken Montana’s stream access law, resulting in many streams you currently fish becoming off limits.

• Contact YOUR House member as listed on your Phone tree sheet; If you can’t remember who that is go to the legislative map on http://nris.mt.gov/favicon.ico
• As implied in previous messages, many legislators change their email addresses after arriving in Helena. If you incur a kickback on your legislator please use the Legislative Electronic Message Service, http://leg.mt.gov/css/sessions/62nd/legwebmessage.asp & listed below, to send your response. Don’t forget to leave a voice message on 406-444-4800 as well. If all else fails, feel free to contact me, and I will tell you who you need to call.

HB309 has been heard in House Ag Committee AND HAS ALREADY HEADED FOR THE HOUSE FLOOR for 2nd Reading. That could happen as early as TOMORROW OR MONDAY, SO WE MUST ACT FAST.

You received earlier alerts on HB 309: This is an egregious attempt to stop sportsmen from their right to recreate on any state waters, except lakes, up to the high water mark. Many contradictions are evident in this bill:

All diverted waters will be off-limits:
Even under the narrowest possible interpretation of language in the bill, these AND MANY OTHER waters would become “ditches” and thus off limits:

• Ruby River below the Ruby irrigation dam
• Poindexter Slough on the Beaverhead River
• Side channels of the Jefferson River
• Fleshman Creek in Livingston
• The East Channel of the Bitterroot River near Tucker Crossing
• Sun River
• Spring Creek in Choteau
• Milk River below the St. Mary’s diversion
• Many side channels of the Yellowstone River
• Flint Creek
• The side channels of Rattlesnake Creek in Missoula

More literal interpretations of this bill indicate it would affect ANY RIVER OR STREAM IN THE STATE WITH FLOWS THAT INCLUDE WATER RETURNED FROM IRRIGATION PRACTICES, INCLUDING WATER THAT ORIGINATED IN THE SAME STREAM. That means these AND MANY OTHER waters would become “ditches:”
Almost every water in Montana has some sort of device to facilitate irrigation; all will be off-limits to recreational use
Sportsmen will be helpless to identify which streams would be off-limits with HB309; constituting an entrapment situation.
Our Stream Access Laws have survived the test of time and many, many State and US Supreme Court battles!!! It’s a valid, secure law that needs no so-called “improvements”.

• The bill language is clear and does NOT do what the sponsors suggest all it does is erode Montana's stream access law.
• This bill does NOT solve any real problem that exists. Montana's stream access law is clear, the public is not allowed to recreate on irrigation ditches nor do we want to! All this bill does is erode Montana's stream access law

Lots of sportsmen and sportswomen have fought hard to keep our Stream Access Laws the best in the West. Spread the word today!!!

Remember, all legislators can also be contacted by the Legislative Comment Service as well: http://leg.mt.gov/css/sessions/62nd/legwebmessage.asp; and by calling 406-444-4800 and leaving a voice message.

Thank you for stepping up for Montana’s wildlife, lands, waters and our hunting/fishing heritage.
 
PEAX Trekking Poles

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,019
Messages
2,041,343
Members
36,430
Latest member
SoDak24
Back
Top