Tom
New member
"Refuges are becoming more popular as tourist destinations, but Idaho still will lose almost a third of its personnel on seven national wildlife refuges, which encompass 84,000 acres and more than 50,000 visitors each year."
"Some also are easily accessible for auto tours, hunting, picnicking or boating."
"Budget cutbacks also may affect hunting on refuges. Some, like Kootenai, have to pump water to maintain wetlands. If refuges can't afford to pump water, they can't attract waterfowl."
You think maybe they could charge a $1 per tourist, a boat fee, a picnic fee, a waterfowl pump fee and cover the old geezers salary whos retireing?
There's an idea for you Idahoans who want to use those places more. It says people come from Montana too, Canada, get some fees from them, expecially Canadians. Heck they charge us a $50 tax to take a gun into their country.
"Some also are easily accessible for auto tours, hunting, picnicking or boating."
"Budget cutbacks also may affect hunting on refuges. Some, like Kootenai, have to pump water to maintain wetlands. If refuges can't afford to pump water, they can't attract waterfowl."
You think maybe they could charge a $1 per tourist, a boat fee, a picnic fee, a waterfowl pump fee and cover the old geezers salary whos retireing?
There's an idea for you Idahoans who want to use those places more. It says people come from Montana too, Canada, get some fees from them, expecially Canadians. Heck they charge us a $50 tax to take a gun into their country.