2024 Colorado Draw Results Thread

Togie - I see the new stats are out. If you get a chance can you run your program with the 2024. I'm just curious to see the new stats.

Also since I am asking for favors - maybe show the stats for the last couple of years to see if there are any changes or trends occurring.

Thanks-Tim

I don't want to steal @TOGIE thunder, but I try and run a similar model some years, just started it yesterday at the airport.

last year the average odds of getting a RM Sheep tag as a resident with 3+10 or more was 3.68% and at 3+9 or less the average odds were 0.93%
I only looked at:
- Resident Ram or E/S Tags in 2024 (222 issued)
- Applications where the applicant had 3+0 or more points AND actually applied for a hunt code.

222 Resident Ram or E/S tags were drawn out of 8930 apps that met the above criteria.

So, if the draw was completely random, the "simple odds" for any given app would be 2.6%.

But it's obviously not completely random. The shakeout was:

3+10 points or more = 5% odds of drawing (drew 118 tags out of 2381 apps)
3+9 points or less = 1.6% odds of drawing (drew 104 tags out of 6549 apps)



note: I haven't completely error-checked my hand-keyed source data, might be off by 1 or 2 apps or tags, but it's 99% there.
 
Last edited:
there's a massive statistical advantage and benefit for having all those points in the MSG draw...

most people will die without a ram or billy on the wall regardless of whether or not they tweak it. and they better not $*)Q!#@$ tweak it.

I thought one of the proposals from the working group was to replace the MSG weighted point system with a standard bonus point system. It would mostly be a moot point because the two systems yield almost the exact same results, as shown by the Toprut guy about 5 years ago. But people seem to grasp the idea of "more tickets in the hat", but not "divide my random# by some value". So maybe there would be less bitching and moaning? Oh who am I kidding.

Here is the article but it might only show up if you can log in.

 
Got a ewe tag a couple hours away with an unusually long season, gonna have to do some scouting this spring/summer.

Been meaning to become a rmbs member, this'll be the impetus to make it happen. Can't make any of the events, though, it's a long way to the front range.
 
I thought one of the proposals from the working group was to replace the MSG weighted point system with a standard bonus point system. It would mostly be a moot point because the two systems yield almost the exact same results, as shown by the Toprut guy about 5 years ago. But people seem to grasp the idea of "more tickets in the hat", but not "divide my random# by some value". So maybe there would be less bitching and moaning? Oh who am I kidding.

Here is the article but it might only show up if you can log in.


sometimes i'm not sure the issue is whether we divide by a random number or toss more tickets in the hat.

i surmise that the primary issue leading to the most prominent and loudest bitching and moaning is that every high and max point holder thinks they deserve to be guaranteed a tag and seeing anyone but themselves ever draw gives them the heart attack that was probably gonna come tomorrow regardless.
 
It seems the working group arrived at “change the system purely for the sake of change”, not to actually improve anything; for MSG at least.
 
It seems the working group arrived at “change the system purely for the sake of change”, not to actually improve anything; for MSG at least.
Or they changed it for simplicity… 🤯

Have you ever tried to explain how the draw worked previously.

Well you get assigned an application number. Then we pick new values for each number 0-9. Example 1=7, 0=4, 7=3…

If you have more than three points you live on to the next level.

Then we take that number and… aw #*^@#*… I can’t even remember this morning. But it’s basically a bonus point system at the end of the day with a bunch of bs in the middle.

Statistically the chances will be the same but you will actually be able to explain how the process works.
 
Or they changed it for simplicity… 🤯

Have you ever tried to explain how the draw worked previously.

Well you get assigned an application number. Then we pick new values for each number 0-9. Example 1=7, 0=4, 7=3…

If you have more than three points you live on to the next level.

Then we take that number and… aw #*^@#*… I can’t even remember this morning. But it’s basically a bonus point system at the end of the day with a bunch of bs in the middle.

Statistically the chances will be the same but you will actually be able to explain how the process works.
Could be wrong, but think he was more talking about the OIL issue and the ability to only apply for one species changes… rather than an issue with changing to names in a hat.

But agreed, will be nice that everyone can actually explain how our draw works if the way the names are picked changes
 
Statistically the chances will be the same but you will actually be able to explain how the process works.

but bonus points is the gateway drug to squaring bonus points, then cubing them, then still bitching and moaning because max point holders don't get their supposedly guaranteed tag, and then and then and then...

some people still don't even understand how hunt codes and A, B, and C tags work; that's their problem and catering to the lowest common IQ is no reason to tweak things that work great. i'm still adamantly against changing it.
 
but bonus points is the gateway drug to squaring bonus points, then cubing them, then still bitching and moaning because max point holders don't get their supposedly guaranteed tag, and then and then and then...

some people still don't even understand how hunt codes and A, B, and C tags work; that's their problem and catering to the lowest common IQ is no reason to tweak things that work great. i'm still adamantly against changing it.
Oh I know, I just wanted to make an attempt at how the draw works now and gave up. Everyone isn’t gonna be happy no matter what changes occur. I’ll keep applying for my dream hunt sheep tag and maybe some day I’ll get to hunt it. Until then I’ll just keep supporting rmbs and hope the sheep are still on the mountain! If it wasn’t for rmbs and a few others last year my chances could have become a whole lot worse!
 
but bonus points is the gateway drug to squaring bonus points, then cubing them, then still bitching and moaning because max point holders don't get their supposedly guaranteed tag, and then and then and then...

Yes, I totally get this. Some people just basically want a pure preference point system, especially if they have max points. It just doesn't work for very high demand hunts like MSG, but we're still arguing about it. It's either greed or ignorance, or both. The many types of draws between a purely random and strict preference point system are constantly getting flack for not being "fair", reminds me of the debate over taxes.
 
Anyone else see a .25 charge from CPW on their card today? I’m in for elk and deer draw and don’t understand what it could be. I updated my card last week due to old one expiring this month.
IMG_4624.jpeg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
114,020
Messages
2,041,435
Members
36,431
Latest member
Nick3252
Back
Top