warmer
Well-known member
Good choice
It also highlights how some folks can’t even begin to formulate a cogent discussion.
VikingsGuy
Well-known member
It at least he didn’t blame the Illuminati . . . yet.
Dakotakid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2014
- Messages
- 816
A primer reading might be:
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,672
The Illuminati work for the other side, not the landowners team!!
VikingsGuy
Well-known member
We are all just pawns in their grand schemeThe Illuminati work for the other side, not the landowners team!!
PrairieHunter
Well-known member
It's starting to look like an episode of Yellowstone, but with hunters instead of bikers.
Last edited:
I agree; good post, so much nuance. BTW, this thread is getting so long that it's getting difficult to keep up with the correct versus conjecture.
Randy's latest podcast series is an excellent primer on both the forest and the trees of this issue. Episode #2 of 4 just dropped today. In episode 1, he nicely articulates the perspective of both sides and how the functional nature of the land debate is so different in our country today than it was 100+ years ago.
Randy’s attorney brings up a very good point in podcast #2 of his series. Why aren’t hunters outraged at the criminal activity the EMR owner and ranch manager and Carbon County officials have committed in impeding and blocking access to Federal lands. He recommends we contact the US Attorney’s office in Wyoming in Cheyenne and demand Federal justice be initiated against the harassment and impedance of blocking access to Federal lands under the UIA Act it is a misdemeanor to block access or impede access. The podcast makes reference around the 62 minute mark.
(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §3, 23 Stat. 322.)
www.stitcher.com
1063. Obstruction of settlement on or transit over public lands
No person, by force, threats, intimidation, or by any fencing or inclosing, or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to prevent or obstruct, any person from peaceably entering upon or establishing a settlement or residence on any tract of public land subject to settlement or entry under the public land laws of the United States, or shall prevent or obstruct free passage or transit over or through the public lands: Provided, This section shall not be held to affect the right or title of persons, who have gone upon, improved, or occupied said lands under the land laws of the United States, claiming title thereto, in good faith.(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §3, 23 Stat. 322.)
Podcasts | Pandora
Discover your favorite Podcasts from a variety of categories including Daily News, Music, Business, True Crime, Comedy, Politics and more. Listen to Podcasts on Pandora.
Last edited:
BuzzH
Well-known member
The feds control half. A private entity controls the other half, hence the issue these hunters are currently in.
Are you asserting a decision at the state level (it’s not the county level, please stop the misinformation) does not establish a legal precedent that is very beneficial to hunters?
Dakotakid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2014
- Messages
- 816
If the corner does not have posts and a chain, does the UIA apply?Randy’s attorney brings up a very good point in podcast #2 of his series. Why aren’t hunters outraged at the criminal activity the EMR owner and ranch manager and Carbon County officials have committed in impeding and blocking access to Federal lands. He recommends we contact the US Attorney’s office in Wyoming in Cheyenne and demand Federal justice be initiated against the harassment and impedance of blocking access to Federal lands under the UIA Act it is a misdemeanor to block access or impede access. The podcast makes reference around the 62 minute mark.
1063. Obstruction of settlement on or transit over public lands
No person, by force, threats, intimidation, or by any fencing or inclosing, or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to prevent or obstruct, any person from peaceably entering upon or establishing a settlement or residence on any tract of public land subject to settlement or entry under the public land laws of the United States, or shall prevent or obstruct free passage or transit over or through the public lands: Provided, This section shall not be held to affect the right or title of persons, who have gone upon, improved, or occupied said lands under the land laws of the United States, claiming title thereto, in good faith.
(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §3, 23 Stat. 322.)
Podcasts | Pandora
Discover your favorite Podcasts from a variety of categories including Daily News, Music, Business, True Crime, Comedy, Politics and more. Listen to Podcasts on Pandora.
I posted the entire statute several pages ago.
Like driving by a train wreck.
Bigjay73
Well-known member
BuzzH
Well-known member
I was going to explain...but I'm fresh out of crayons.
