shrapnel
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2015
- Messages
- 2,640
Lots of authors (and a few direct witnesses) disagree with your conclusions - it doesn't make them 100% right or wrong, as you are neither 100% right nor wrong. Frankly, the vigorous nature of your defense is enough to cause folks to discount them - even in events that happened this century direct witnesses disagree. The history of Custer is messy - there is no guaranteed answer - to suggest otherwise 150 years later with secondary and tertiary sources is in its own way ignorant - and I do agree that is tough to argue with.
Agreed. That is the genesis of this discussion. I have made a case for Custer not being the fool many made him out to be and many will agree, many won’t. You don’t agree, that is your prerogative, it doesn’t make you wrong.
Comments like Schmalts’ do show lack of knowledge and a bias that I was guilty of many years ago until I started reading and studying the history of Custer and the Little Bighorn Battle. I was surprised that Montana named a forest, county and a city after a loser like Custer, until I found out more about him, his life and accomplishments.
I also understand why Phil Sheridan put so much confidence in Custer and why I wouldn’t want to serve under him. The dynamics of Custer and his life are complicated and diverse. Claims of his stupidity though, are ignorant and reinforcing those claims border on stupidity.
I will admit I am more of a Custer supporter than detractor, but I will also admit he was not perfect, flawless or incapable of mistakes. Most negative comments come from people that only know of his demise in 1876 and nothing of his military accomplishments throughout the Civil War. He did do other things after the Civil War that have historical significance and few are aware of those things including the expedition into the Black Hills in 1874 or the Yellowstone expedition in 1873.
Learning about these other aspects of his life and exploits will give you a better view of the individual and much of that has become the baseline by which I judge Custer.