Don Fischer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2017
- Messages
- 3,141
A 270 bullet bounced off a boar? Sorry but I have a hard time buying that! If it even hit and blew up, you simply used the wrong bullet! Little old woman in Canada has the 32 world record grizzly she killed with a 22 long RF and you had a 270 bounce off a boar? amazing!Thank you for your response.
Pardon I but I disagree.
Below is link to the anatomy of a deer,,,,,structurally the same as an elk. The shoulder blade covers the upper part of the lung,,,,,lethal zone and also the spinal column,,,another lethal zone.
The shoulder blade is so close to most of the lungs, that prudence should dictate that any caliber used should be able to penetrate the shoulder blade or the big heavy bones just below it.
As former hunting guide I have developed great confidence in Barnes bullets. A 243 with a Barnes bullet would have penetrated that shoulder blade.
Either way a caliber should be “enough gun” to deal with issues that will arise even for the best hunters.
A Murphy’s Law insurance policy.
Any 257 caliber or 6.5 caliber would have penetrated that deers’ shoulder blade.
For many years I was a hunting guide for hunters going after huge wild boar on barley fields. Many were true Russian Boar with the thick cartilaginous shoulder plate that also cover the lungs.
I have had my lead core .270 bullet bounce right off that plate on a coming in angling shot.
A few day later another hunter took that boar and we could see the fresh scar that did not even get to meat. That would not have happened with the .270 and Barnes bullets
There is a middle ground between calibers with too much kick and more power than needed and ones which are suited for only the most ideal conditions.
As guide I set my minimum caliber at 6.5 and discouraged hunters from going over 30 cal due to recoil.
Anything I have said about using a .243 you can triple regarding a hunter using a .223.