T
tjones
Guest
I got a bridge Sytes,,,you buying?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Close... very close. If you have to many in there it get's confused though... You do it twice if you want to get crazy though like this :
I do think hitting a Running wolf is hard to do... (Just guessing here, no first hand knowlege ) So that might be the reason for only one dead wolf. I'm guessing had they shot into the ground the wolf would have scattered just the same and shooting one.
Don't blame the wolves for the failures of Wyoming's Welfare Ranchers
Gerald, remember a Montana warden won't be the one "throwing the book" at a wolf shooter, there will be a Federal investigator, a Federal prosecutor and a Federal judge, all well up the food chain of a Montana warden.
We didn't reach our quota - so - live up to your screen name and quit shooting crooked:
2009 Quota - 75, 2009 wolves killed by hunters - 72. http://billingsgazette.com/news/sta...cle_ebeb462e-d332-11de-a394-001cc4c03286.html
In what post did I ever mention scare tactics, right wing politicians, etc? All I said was that if I was in their shoes I would have exterminated the entire pack.
And yes, I am also a sportsman, who actually cares about the future of hunting for my children, grandchildren and great grandchildren. I suggest you start caring also before it's too late. I've never told any red riding hood stories so once again - maybe you should get the facts straight?
I assume that meant we (hunters) couldn't even kill enough wolves to reach the quota. We reached the 72 in 3 weeks. What 3 wolves considering their running in herds? What's your point there? I do shoot straight, and I don't use BS to make a point.I know when we could hunt them we didn't even reach our quota
36 of 44 HD in the state are over objectives according to the EMP. If your statement isn't Right wing politics I don't know what is.I hope you enjoy your hunting because your great grandkids won't if the govt keeps it up. Oh, so they killed a couple of wolves because they are preying on livestock. Why do you think they are preying on livestock anyways? They've killed off most of the game. Sounds like you need to pull your head out of your ass too.
In context you said: I assume that meant we (hunters) couldn't even kill enough wolves to reach the quota. We reached the 72 in 3 weeks. What 3 wolves considering their running in herds? What's your point there? I do shoot straight, and I don't use BS to make a point.
You also said:
36 of 44 HD in the state are over objectives according to the EMP. If your statement isn't Right wing politics I don't know what is.
Sportsman abide by the rules and regulations. Poachers don't.
I tell you what shoots-straight: When we're in heaven looking down on our poor grandchildren, I will bitch slap you back to earth so they can kick your ass since they aren't allowed to hunt or own guns. And, if I'm wrong - you can bitch slap me back to earth My statements have nothing to do with politics? I just want to help in the preservation of our hunting heritage. We have to slow down the exponential growth in wolves. I'm also curious where you got your data? (36 of 44 HD)
You can find my info on the Fish and game web page.
If our childerens Grand children aren't allowed to hunt, it won't be because of the wolf, or any other predator. FACT. I'll need a picture of you so I know who to "BItch Slap"
If your not playing politics then what's up with this quote? Now the wolf is responsible for our guns being taken away. I thought Obama was doing that.
If you want to preserve hunting, then join a "SPORTSMANS" club and get involved, but be ready to ditch the right wing political BS.
The (36 of 44) came from the 2008 numbers. I just checked the their web. they have it broke down by each individual hunting district and the new numbers have been posted. Their are 161 individual districts. The 44 were EMP areas. We are Under objective in 32 of 161 HD's as of 2010 numbers. That's still 20% of the region.
http://fwpiis.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=46892
This years archery bull. The last ones the wolves left to live I killed.
I have more fear from right wing wackos than I do from the left wing ones,( they actually scare me way more than a pack of wolves do). Packing their pistols on their hips because they can. The left wingers, just sit around eating tofu singing Kum bi yah. I believe I'm politically in the middle of this mess. Leaning no direction in particular.
I"m 6' 208lbs, Im 49 years old, and been a General Contractor for 20 + years, in construction for 33. I hunt more than 80 days a year, trap another 25 or so. I have 2 animals is Boone and Crocket. I have been married for 27 years, with 3 fully grown children. If you need more info, I'll be happy to give it too you.
For those fabricating a story beyond the actual info... any reliable sources / info to refute to info as provided by the Warden and the men?
What fictional additions are you worrying about? The "large fiery eyes"? That "God saved" them? Or some of the other nonsense in their statements? If the guys wanted to "be innocent" they would have stated "there is a dead wolf 20 yards from where I shot with a bullet in his chest exiting his butt" and we would all agree that the drama queen and his buddy were afraid. But when he states that the wolves were up in the timber and a "lone wolf" howled and then the other wolves howled and it was "eerie" so they started randomly shooting all over the hill side, then there story starts to "smell a bit fishy".I suppose once the USFWS finalize their investigation... I believe we will have a decent picture of the situation and if it turns out they are not charged for killing an ES wolf, hopefully those throwing out these fictional additions will move to support your fellow hunter (30 years of hunting)... as if this was a neighbor or friend... or heck, maybe yourself...
You are now making up facts, the wolves did not "surround" them. And you seem to leave out the FACT that He did not carefully take care of the meat, resulting in the loss of 100% of the meat (that is a FACT). How often is the head packed out first in Montana? Where is the tag if you haul the head out first? Do you leave it on the meat or do you have it attached to the antlers?To get back to the facts... This was a SOLO hunter who went on a day hunt / hike and found himself successful with a nice bull. He packed out what was practical and often solo packed first... evening setting solo... he calls his friend who brings out his horses to assist in packing the rest of the 3-400 lbs
the next morning and arrive early afternoon... they eat after their ride and prep the meat further for packing it out... wolves surround and the event as they describe occurred.
Again, why make up "facts"? If he was unprepared to deal with the meat, which he was, then just point out that he was unprepared. Don't make excuses about nonsense of forgetting a rope. And why try and excuse his wanton waste of meat with "UNMANAGED wolf issue" when the one shooter of the elk even states that he has seen wolves 60% of the time he has been hunting.You want to talk about hanging meat... or whatever, sure... hind sight 20/20. The guy found he hit gold... maybe forgot to bring rope... maybe hunting this area many times and not having the type of UNMANAGED wolf issue that has excelled... hit a reality point on this successful hunt... and lesson learned... Bah, who knows - knowing the events of this incident... sure any Arm chair Quarterback can CALL "He should have..." all they want... Hind sight 20/20.
Was he that ignorant to the fact that there were wolves that might eat elk in that area? And it was in Grizzly country too. To somehow make excuses for him is incredulous.On another note, I am very [angry]. I lost all my hard-earned elk meat to a pack of damned wolves. I feel fortunate and blessed by God to have gotten out of there with my life, my friend’s life and [the] horses’ lives. I’ve been out in the mountains five times in a week and have seen wolves on three of those times, including this attack.
How many things do you want to be paranoid of when you hunt? You now think somehow the guy was brave and needs support because he hunted solo and didn't break his leg? How can you call him a "seasoned hunter" when, thru his own actions, he wasted an entire friggin' elk, except for the Antlers that he was able to save and take back to town? If a guy like that wants "support" from "sportsmen" then he should be prepared to take care of the meat after he kills an elk and not hold news conferences or issues statements about horses with "large fiery eyes" and "violent" wolves who never bit anything that he was aware of.SHould a solo hunter EVER hunt solo? what about safety... if one broke a leg and came close to dieing... people here may suggest "No one should hunt solo..." Bah - "what if" this to death... though come on guys... You are a hunter... we are hunters... how about supporting your fellow seasoned hunter UNLESS adverse investigation reveals something other than the info as provided.
Sure, he should not hunt solo... I should not hunt solo... He should have hung his meat... I should always hang my meat... Griz area or not... Black bears are present... mountain lions are present... coyotes are present... for ANYONE who has left elk on the ground to return later - are you not being a model hunter by not hanging meat ALL THE TIME??? Are you recklessly leaving meat to be ravaged by other wildlife because YOU are too lazy to hang your meat??? No. it is using your past experience of the area... it is using the setting to define your actions... evening hit... you planned on a day hunt - though BOOM - there you are face to face with a great bull... DO YOU PASS UP to be a model sportsmanlike hunter because you know the night is an hour away... and if you do shoot you have a few hours of work ahead of you??? Maybe you will pass on a bull... I'll shoot and do the best I am able with my current surroundings.
Why should we support these two guys? They are making all hunters look like wingnut, anti-wolf hating, meat wasting, .44 Mag-a-blazing looney tunes with their news conference. These are the types of guys that DON'T deserve support.What I am getting at is... hind sight is always 20/20... anyone can "what if" something to death... Though if this was a fellow hunter you personally knew... I DOUBT you would go to such extremes of adding fictional content. SUPPORT YOUR FELLOW VETERAN HUNTER of 30 years... as YOU would want to be supported...
As for the comments regarding humans should not fear a pack of wolves... I offer this... though, as we know - those who want to believe what they want - most likely will NOT watch these news clips. OR if they do - they will offer fictional additions to these incidents as well.
Hmm according to Saveourelk.com wolves like to chase little kids being pulled on a sled behind a quad. Man that site is something. They also mention a teacher that was killed by a pack of wolves...I seem to remember that being true, but not completely sure.
A felony charge was dismissed Wednesday against an accused elk poacher after a Blaine County judge determined that the Idaho Department of Fish and Game bungled an evidence test crucial to the case.
Tony Mayer, a 59-year-old Twin Falls man and the founder of the anti-wolf website SaveElk.com, still faces three misdemeanor game charges for allegedly killing a bull elk out of season last year in the Alturas Lake area of northern Blaine County.
While Magistrate Court Judge R. Ted Israel dismissed a felony count of unlawful killing of a trophy bull elk, he found during a preliminary hearing that Mayer illegally killed the animal.
"Clearly, if you add up the days from the defendant's story, then he killed the elk out of season," Israel said at the conclusion of the hearing in Hailey.
A preliminary hearing is a judicial procedure wherein a magistrate court judge determines if sufficient evidence exists to transfer a felony case to district court for further prosecution. Misdemeanor charges are not considered during a preliminary hearing, and Mayer is still charged with misdemeanor counts of hunting without an elk tag, hunting without an archery permit and unlawful possession of protected wildlife.
Israel scheduled a pretrial conference on the misdemeanor charges for Nov. 15. Mayer has pleaded not guilty to all three charges.
Israel dismissed the felony charge "without prejudice," which means that the Blaine County Prosecuting Attorney's Office has the option to refile the charge. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Matt Fredback said Thursday that "we plan to refile."
Israel said he dismissed the charge because Fish and Game conducted an "invalid test" to determine if the elk was truly of trophy status.
In Idaho, the difference between illegally killing a trophy elk as opposed to a regular elk is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor.
Trophy status is determined by the size and symmetry of the antlers, which is determined by official measurements using the "Boone and Crockett" measurement standards.
Israel determined that the test was invalid because Boone and Crockett standards require a 60-day drying period at room temperature to allow for fluid loss, a process referred to as shrinkage. Testimony at Wednesday's hearing showed that Fish and Game kept the antlers in a freezer storage locker and that the antlers were only kept at room temperature for three days prior to the test.
When we're in heaven looking down on our poor grandchildren, I will bitch slap you back to earth so they can kick your ass since they aren't allowed to hunt or own guns.
100 posts and 2000 views,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, come on baby!!
Let me guess, you are a member of the NRA, watch Fox News, and sleep with a Nite-Lite on beside your bed.....