Archer86
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2022
- Messages
- 269
Wyoming got that figured out thanks to the special drawJust have to figure out the huge budget issues that causes in some states, but yeah- nothing stopping states from doing that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wyoming got that figured out thanks to the special drawJust have to figure out the huge budget issues that causes in some states, but yeah- nothing stopping states from doing that.
Right because in Wyoming, your favorite state to complain about, we "only" allow NR's to get over 50% of pronghorn tags, apply for any leftovers for deer, elk and pronghorn, 13.5K elk tags, and quotas that exceed 20% in the general NR deer Regions.
If that's not enough NR access to our wildife, I would suggest looking elsewhere and find a better state to complain about...if only obviously.
And allowing NR's to apply for the leftovers.Wyoming got that figured out thanks to the special draw
I would do my part by paying higher resident fees here in CO. 90/10 across the board would be outstanding here and I support WY in pursuing it there (where I am a NR).Just have to figure out the huge budget issues that causes in some states, but yeah- nothing stopping states from doing that.
It’s not as much an issue in a good economy as it will be during a recession.Just have to figure out the huge budget issues that causes in some states, but yeah- nothing stopping states from doing that.
Yes, actually you do, you've spent countless posts, high pitch whining.No Blow hard Buzz. I don’t complain about current allocations. If take a minute an stop patting your back. You’d see I complain out WY moving in the wrong direction. Like your greedy mantra of “ if we can’t be them join them”
The idea that states like Wyoming ( and three others) that have ample populations of wildlife and ample tags available for all their residents should be moving towards restricting NR allocations even more… is just greed. Like you have shown, if the shoe fits steal it
I guess I am clueless. 90/10. Every state, every species. Easy solution. There should be a significant benefit to being a resident.
Yes, actually you do, you've spent countless posts, high pitch whining.
Residents here want 90-10 for LQ elk, deer, and pronghorn. Frankly, I would rather see a 12 year old Resident hunting the better areas than a NR...every....single...time.
Prove your whining...specifically what states have dropped their allocations from 90-10 to 95-5 in the last 20 years.90/10 won’t satisfy the greed, after that it will 95/5 and so on……
I agree residents should get a significant benefit. They should also pay in accordance to that benefit.
Let them pay for the administration of the lands their animals inhabit as well
Right, that's why 90-10 passed for moose, sheep, goat, bison, and eventually grizzlies.Good thing most of, well some ass kissers might, don’t give two shits what you want …every single time
Wyoming got that figured out thanks to the special draw
Prove your whining...specifically what states have dropped their allocations from 90-10 to 95-5 in the last 20 years.
If it were up to outfitters, the special fee for everything would be significantly more than it is now, even with the recent fee increases. They would also rather that 100% of the tags were at the special fee and completely get rid of the regular fee.Not sure, perhaps you’re right.
Don’t forget to consider the wants of the landowners and outfitters… all residents are not created equal, after all.
You'll see 90-10 for the rest as well.
Prove your whining...specifically what states have dropped their allocations from 90-10 to 95-5 in the last 20 years.
Show your work, it could be.North Dakota?? But its much worse than 95-5. I wish it was 95-5...
If that happens, it will be 95-5...100% agree.
NRs might just get lucky and see some transferable landowner/outfitter tags in the deal though, would be a shame to leave the table empty handed.
I respectfully disagree. Through 4 years of CPW Roundtable meetings I attended and current meetings to revamp big game draw, CPW constantly noted that all their hunter surveys found a large majority preferred some form of point system. It provides some predictability in draws, and offers eventual access to units that hunt better than OTC. If recommendations of the current draw revision working group are honored, expect to see some mix of preference points and hybrid draw for high demand units starting in 2025, and not because it benefits CPW.CPW staffers have said as much in their meetings. The whole point of the point system is to generate revenue not to benefit the consumer in any way.
I thought you said I lose...every...single...time?You’re a perfect example of why it will happen all it will take is one to do it and then greedy pricks like you will jump on the bandwagon
Oregon 97-3 on antelope/bear and 95-5 on elk/deerzProve your whining...specifically what states have dropped their allocations from 90-10 to 95-5 in the last 20 years.