rideold
Well-known member
In my opinion there are many aspects to the problem Some we know, some we don't, some we can control, some we can't. I've swung full spectrum on this over the years. When Columbine happened here in Colorado I was not a hunter, didn't own any guns and felt that if we just took the tool away then at least the damage would be downgraded. For a while I was with the camp that sees this as a price of our freedoms and we should mourn the dead and move on. Now I'm somewhere in the middle. I get that "mass" shootings are a small percentage of yearly deaths and school related ones are an even smaller portion. The thing about these kind of tragedies is that they are more tragic to the populace than a car accident or a suicide. They are more public and more horrifying (because of the helplessness of the victims in my opinion). In the end I think there are some things we can control better like access to school grounds and some types of fire arms. I also think there are better solutions to how the schools handle an active harmful event. I'd like to see some studies that support that holing students up in classrooms is safer than running like hell. I'd also like to see active harmful training in the schools. Kids need to know more what is possible. Not trying to scare them but educate them. Maybe if more kids were a little scared of it they would speak up more when they see/hear something. Or maybe they would reach out to the kid before they become a gun wielding statistic. Anyway, there needs to be changes on all fronts.