Josh Kuntz
Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 184
IDelkslayer, you are spot on. For those that don't know, the Idaho Fish & Game tried to get a fee increase bill passed through the legislature last year. I don't have any statistics on this, but my understanding from most folks I talk to is that residents are generally in favor of this fee increase. I believe it has been over 10 years since the last increase. The legislators (Moyle/Bair) that are pushing for auction tags jumped in and screwed up the fee increase bill, basically holding it hostage and saying it would only go through if the IDFG commission supported the increase in auction tags. This has to be politics at it's worst. Idaho hunters are TRYING TO PAY MORE in order to better fund the IDFG department, but these f-ing guys won't let a "clean" fee increase bill even go to a vote.
It is really damn frustrating that a tiny number of guys, probably less than 10 key players, are trying to re-invent the wildlife management rules so they can personally benefit, while happily bending over the average Idaho resident AND non-resident hunter. Their plan is to simply be better at politics than the sportsmen community and the IDFG department. The IDFG department cannot really fight back because they rely on the legislature to provide their budget, so that leaves the fight up to us every day hunters. And since most of us have jobs, families, and other time commitments, we are at a natural disadvantage.
If WSF would remove Sayer, it would show the average (busy) hunter that something important is going on and they should probably pay attention and raise their voice. Having dozens or even hundreds of us here on Hunt Talk discuss this will only serve to move the needle so far. We could really use the support of some brave leaders of notable conservation groups and the hunting community to call BS on these actions. WSF is obviously the best suited to lead the charge on this, since Sayer is the chairman of the board.
It is really damn frustrating that a tiny number of guys, probably less than 10 key players, are trying to re-invent the wildlife management rules so they can personally benefit, while happily bending over the average Idaho resident AND non-resident hunter. Their plan is to simply be better at politics than the sportsmen community and the IDFG department. The IDFG department cannot really fight back because they rely on the legislature to provide their budget, so that leaves the fight up to us every day hunters. And since most of us have jobs, families, and other time commitments, we are at a natural disadvantage.
If WSF would remove Sayer, it would show the average (busy) hunter that something important is going on and they should probably pay attention and raise their voice. Having dozens or even hundreds of us here on Hunt Talk discuss this will only serve to move the needle so far. We could really use the support of some brave leaders of notable conservation groups and the hunting community to call BS on these actions. WSF is obviously the best suited to lead the charge on this, since Sayer is the chairman of the board.