Took him long enough to get coaching on how to answer.There was a previous thread that contained a link to an interview with Sheehy where he said that he'd prefer status quo. As noted in that thread, the only proposal prevents public land transfer. In other words, it's a fake campaign issue.
Fwiw, they've started debates, so it might be worth reading those transcripts instead of paying attention to ads.
Just illustrating that we have a guy who has already done a ton for public lands in MT vs a guy who had to wait to confer with advisors on how to answer the question.
If that ammo source article is even true (it’s a turd of a sensationalist publication), it’s worth noting that Brady doesn’t give out a ton of money in politics, and has given to politicians from both parties in the past. (Open Secrets). Whole thing sounds like, what’d you call it? A “fake campaign issue.”