Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
God gave man the dominion over the animals Genesis 1:26Are we so selfish as a community that we begrudge other living things the right to eat?
Go ahead and throw on the fighting belt now, you're gonna hook a big one!God gave man the dominion over the animals Genesis 1:26
God gave man the dominion over the animals Genesis 1:26
That's the problem...biologists and conservationists have basically no say in how to manage them when the courts get involved. So it cant be properly dealt with by the people with the wolf and other species (including homosapians) best interests in mind.but now we have them and we must deal with them.
What's wrong with keeping wolves at lower levels so as to provide for more opportunities for hunters?I can see this going down the road of "We gotta kill all them woofs so I can get my freezer meat!"
Because that's been the narrative from the hunting community for the last 100 years.
Half million cheeseheads take to the woods with guns and bows in Wisconsin they dont need wolves to do the job. They will get it done
So with your logic that wolves do a better job at managing species... Do wolves stop killing when populations are low? Do they manage the number of each gender killed? You can't say wolves do a better job, 5 guys with guns who went out and shot deer all day long and never stop until they're all gone is what wolves do. Wolves don't pay license fees to harvest deer or elk. I can't see the wolves doing a better job than humans. They've proven that they don't do a better job countless times.I've deer hunted 10 years in the Midwest both wolf country and non wolf country each. If your area can support wolves and you don't have them, it's worth getting them from a prey-management perspective. They prevent overpopulation on areas that don't get sufficient human hunting pressure, and reduce disease outbreaks. I don't buy the we take the place of wolves, so we don't need them argument. They do a far better job of population management than humans do due to our bureaucracy. I'm also a big proponent of wolf hunting. In a perfect world we could all buy a cheap OTC wolf tag in every state every year. Yeah that's more tags than wolves but they are so wary I doubt hunters would put much of a dent in their population so long as we're not shooting them from aircraft, at night, with hounds or bait. The main trouble is there is so much opposition from the wolf huggers that wolf hunting gets so restricted that no one wants new wolves in an area knowing they are going to be untouchable.
Yeah go ahead and mock the bible quote but there is still an important principle behind it, which is humans are by far the most influential/powerful of all the earth's species, and it's our job to manage the natural world to have functioning ecosystems in the face of our own pollution and encroachment - Letting it manage itself is totally unrealistic whether that's wolf/deer/livestock dynamics or just about anything else.
So with your logic that wolves do a better job at managing species... Do wolves stop killing when populations are low? Do they manage the number of each gender killed? You can't say wolves do a better job, 5 guys with guns who went out and shot deer all day long and never stop until they're all gone is what wolves do. Wolves don't pay license fees to harvest deer or elk. I can't see the wolves doing a better job than humans. They've proven that they don't do a better job countless times.
ElaborateWhat a load of BS...
Elaborate
Ah sidelines are no fun, the debating is fun!Edited. Bah, I'll enjoy this one from the sidelines... Unless you smack the qb