peterk1234
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 640
I think my question is on topic, so here it goes.
I do not understand the logic behind taking out the larger bucks from the population if you are trying to improve the quality of the herd.
Why not limit it to 2x2s only, for example, and no doe tags for let's say the next five years? That's how natural selection works. The big strong ones mate and the weak die.
Plus, imposing limits like this would likely discourage a lot of people from traveling very far to hunt in the state, both resident and non resident.
I'm sure I'm not understanding something, but I'm not sure what it is.
I do not understand the logic behind taking out the larger bucks from the population if you are trying to improve the quality of the herd.
Why not limit it to 2x2s only, for example, and no doe tags for let's say the next five years? That's how natural selection works. The big strong ones mate and the weak die.
Plus, imposing limits like this would likely discourage a lot of people from traveling very far to hunt in the state, both resident and non resident.
I'm sure I'm not understanding something, but I'm not sure what it is.