Housing Appreciation and Inflation: Future Outlook?

Sure, but that isn't the whole story. Poor (and rich) people benefit from a robust energy grid, even if they don't realize it. A tax credit is only useful if you PAY taxes. There is probably no 'perfect' solution to a situation where everyone wants cheap, reliable electricity and doesn't want to pay to make it cheap and reliable. That rule goes for a lot of things we enjoy in America: roads, healthcare, public lands, etc.
So have you installed solar yet?
 
So have you installed solar yet?
No. We have discussed. Hydro Electricity prices here low enough to make my break even too long. I continue to consider it, but I didn't see the sun for all but about 8 days this winter (El Nino strikes again). However, I did put in 4 more inches of insulation.
 
No. We have discussed. Hydro Electricity prices here low enough to make my break even too long. I continue to consider it, but I didn't see the sun for all but about 8 days this winter (El Nino strikes again). However, I did put in 4 more inches of insulation.
When you said I can make the grid more robust by putting solar on my roof, I decided to get a quote. This is what I found out.

6% return on my investment.
No electric bill from Northwest energy with net metering.
Get to starve the beast out of $4,300.
Made in America Silfab panels.

What do you think?
 
When you said I can make the grid more robust by putting solar on my roof, I decided to get a quote. This is what I found out.

6% return on my investment.
No electric bill from Northwest energy with net metering.
Get to starve the beast out of $4,300.
Made in America Silfab panels.

What do you think?
I thought your bill was pretty low but that seems pretty attractive. If I remember correctly, you probably still have to pay Northwest for the privilege of having an account. It was like $30 per month when I was there. You add the risk of the sun not shining and reduce the risk from prolonged power outage for some disaster reason.
 
I thought your bill was pretty low but that seems pretty attractive. If I remember correctly, you probably still have to pay Northwest for the privilege of having an account. It was like $30 per month when I was there. You add the risk of the sun not shining and reduce the risk from prolonged power outage for some disaster reason.
$4 a month meter rent fee is all. I still would have a natural gas bill from Northwest for furnace and water heater. $14,400 still sounds steep for a 4.5kw grid tied solar package installed. The company, Freedom Energy, is only 10 days out to install, and eager to get started. Maybe they can sharpen their pencil, if they want the job?

The only way this makes sense is if it raises the value of my house when I go to sell it next spring. Zero dollar electric bill could be a great selling feature. Could even spark a bidding war amongst half a dozen California refugees!😁
 
I could always DIY the install and hire an electrician to do the grid tie.
$2,500 for 11 panels plus shipping.

Panels seem to be on par with the competition, although maybe a little more (5%) more expensive. I don't mind paying the extra for American made. The installation cost is the problem I am having. I ran the numbers through Avista calculator and it still shows I don't break even. It doesn't have anything to do with the panels or efficiency. It is all in the installation cost. If I assume the inflation on electricity is closer to 3% rather than the 2%, then the numbers put me in the black. If you could DIY any part of it, the numbers change dramatically. This goes back to my belief that we have a labor problem in this country and it will make inflation very sticky, but a topic for another thread.

If you installed a $14,000 system with a positive/neutral breakeven, the value of your house should increase by $14,000. Unfortunately, there is no way to know what the value of the home was before you start so it all gets mixed together in the purchase price.
 
Revisiting thoughts on this topic.



"It's possible we'll see a 50% [correction] in some spots, but I would say somewhere around a 30% correction in real estate," Vermeulen said of real estate investments.

Property prices could drop by around 30% across the entire residential and commercial property market, he added.

Those losses could take seven to 10 years to recover from, he said, due to the long nature of real estate cycles.

****

Still, most real estate veterans don't expect the residential housing market to crash. The US housing market is so short on inventory it could take at least three or four years for supply and demand to balance out, the National Association of Realtors previously said, and low supply will keep a floor underneath home prices for the foreseeable future.
 
Revisiting thoughts on this topic.



"It's possible we'll see a 50% [correction] in some spots, but I would say somewhere around a 30% correction in real estate," Vermeulen said of real estate investments.

Property prices could drop by around 30% across the entire residential and commercial property market, he added.

Those losses could take seven to 10 years to recover from, he said, due to the long nature of real estate cycles.

****

Still, most real estate veterans don't expect the residential housing market to crash. The US housing market is so short on inventory it could take at least three or four years for supply and demand to balance out, the National Association of Realtors previously said, and low supply will keep a floor underneath home prices for the foreseeable future.
You can read whatever version of that you like all day. If I had a dollar for every article on a strategist bullshit opinion I'd never have to worry about what the market will do ever again.
 
I quoted both sides of the spectrum.

One of the average American highest $ staked, sole investments. Portfolios are based on various sectors to offset if/when one sector drops, etc.

This is not a variety of ETFs nor shares within one of many companies - this is a mass sum of $ in a single investment. That said, people will read whatever version they like all day though information is king.
 
Revisiting thoughts on this topic.



"It's possible we'll see a 50% [correction] in some spots, but I would say somewhere around a 30% correction in real estate," Vermeulen said of real estate investments.

Property prices could drop by around 30% across the entire residential and commercial property market, he added.

Those losses could take seven to 10 years to recover from, he said, due to the long nature of real estate cycles.

****

Still, most real estate veterans don't expect the residential housing market to crash. The US housing market is so short on inventory it could take at least three or four years for supply and demand to balance out, the National Association of Realtors previously said, and low supply will keep a floor underneath home prices for the foreseeable future.
The inventory of single family homes is about half of prepandemic levels and unlikely to increase substantially until construction costs and interest rates change. Low supply = high prices. As an example, when mortgage rates went from 3 to 8 percent, the price of houses remained high.
 
"We start to see a trickle-effect… People are starting to get laid off as unemployment rises. People have burned through their savings and inflation is crazy higher," he said. "Eventually, people aren't going to be able to pay their mortgages."

I knew it was just a matter of time before we get "the sky is falling!" when unemployment hit 4%.

Housing continues to be "weird"?. Just read Basmajian's (https://epbresearch.substack.com/p/...e&r=521y8&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email) research note on housing. The money charts are below. Builders are starting to get back to normal levels on finished homes and are way above normal on "new" homes (which includes built, in-process, and ordered). At the same time, existing homes are still near lows in terms of inventory. This explains why home builders stocks (ITB, XHB) have turned over the last few weeks. We need to keep an eye on unemployment in construction sector. I'm not sure any of this supports the lumber price article, because new homes are being built at a pretty good clip. Just a lot of conflicting data.

Screenshot 2024-07-04 at 4.16.17 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-07-04 at 4.20.39 PM.png
 
"We start to see a trickle-effect… People are starting to get laid off as unemployment rises. People have burned through their savings and inflation is crazy higher," he said. "Eventually, people aren't going to be able to pay their mortgages."

I knew it was just a matter of time before we get "the sky is falling!" when unemployment hit 4%.

Housing continues to be "weird"?. Just read Basmajian's (https://epbresearch.substack.com/p/...e&r=521y8&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email) research note on housing. The money charts are below. Builders are starting to get back to normal levels on finished homes and are way above normal on "new" homes (which includes built, in-process, and ordered). At the same time, existing homes are still near lows in terms of inventory. This explains why home builders stocks (ITB, XHB) have turned over the last few weeks. We need to keep an eye on unemployment in construction sector. I'm not sure any of this supports the lumber price article, because new homes are being built at a pretty good clip. Just a lot of conflicting data.

View attachment 331759
View attachment 331760
 
The supply of single family homes is low. New home construcion would have to triple to close the 7.2 million home gap in 4 to 5 years.
 
The supply of single family homes is low. New home construcion would have to triple to close the 7.2 million home gap in 4 to 5 years.
Add the pending Fed rate drop to the equation, could get interesting.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,668
Messages
2,028,990
Members
36,275
Latest member
johnw3474
Back
Top