SAJ-99
Well-known member
Why? is the your argument people don't want to work hard or even if they work hard it doesn't matter? Or do you just want to argue?Your “Basic Formula” is divorced from reality.
Agree. Not trying to argue really. I will point out that the number is based on gross income, not net, but your math is right. There are some serious problems with household income. The median wage in Spokane is over $30/hr, so a two-income couple (household) with full time jobs should be closer to $130,000 than it is to $65,000. Again, that is a different discussion about how we measure things and how they can be distorted. Here is what I know, the market is functioning at these levels. DR Horton is building new homes in the $430-$500k in the Valley. Someone is buying them. There isn't much existing inventory (increased slightly recently), people with good incomes are moving up, houses priced right move fast, and renting is a viable alternative (probably cheaper than buying).Fiscal responsibility dictates 25-30% of income should be allocated to a mortgage. This is closer to 65%.
I had the same situation in 2007 as @Rie Bread does now. I couldn't afford the house I lived in if I bought it again. That was corrected by a global fiscal crisis with an extended period of high unemployment. Do we fix the current problem the same way? I hope not, but it would fix a lot our complaining about prices of things because demand would fall off a cliff. We have an entire generation of Americans that have lived with relatively stable financial conditions because the Fed plows money/liquidity into the system to fix the problem.