Grey wolf numbers exceed 500 in Idaho

Ithaca 37

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
5,427
Location
Home of the free, Land of the brave
BILLINGS, Mont. — The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates the number of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies has increased to more than 900 since last year, but a top wolf recovery official says the numbers may be near the maximum the region can sustain.

The agency attributed the increasing numbers primarily to Idaho's growing wolf population. The number in Montana is up from 2004 but below 2003, and it is down in Wyoming, where illness and competition for food and territory in Yellowstone National Park seem to have hit the population hard, according to the agency's mid-year estimate.

Overall, the population is doing well and has grown since December, when an estimated 835 wolves roamed the region, Ed Bangs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife's wolf recovery coordinator in Helena, Mont., said Tuesday.

"But people who think wolves are just going to keep going, that's not true," Bangs said. "We're probably approaching as many wolves as we can handle in these conditions and times."

According to the mid-year estimates, used by wildlife officials to gauge where monitoring efforts need to be focused, there were 912 wolves in the three-state region — 166 in Montana, 221 in Wyoming and 525 in Idaho, which Bangs said offers by far the most and best wolf habitat in the region.

At the end of 2004, there were an estimated 153 wolves in Montana, 260 in Wyoming and 422 in Idaho, according to Fish and Wildlife.

Steve Nadeau, statewide large carnivore program coordinator for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, said parts of that state offer places where wolves could still expand. The central part of the state, though, "seems to be pretty saturated with wolves," he said.

This year, he said, Idaho saw a surge in livestock killed by wolves, though he had no immediate tally. As wolves expand their territory, he said, this is to be expected.

"We anticipate an increase in headaches as the population continues to increase," Nadeau said. "Currently, the situation is manageable."

Disease has taken a toll on wolves in parts of Montana and Wyoming. In southern Montana, near Yellowstone, mange has been found in six wolf packs that have encountered significant losses, according to the agency report. Mange can lead to excessive scratching and hair loss that leaves wolves more vulnerable to infection and the elements, said Carolyn Sime, wolf program coordinator for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

Parvo virus, which can cause extreme diarrhea and dehydration and can kill more vulnerable animals, like pups, is suspected in cases in Yellowstone, Bangs said. Fish and Wildlife estimates that the park's population has dropped from 171 last year to 118, with competition for food and territory factoring in, he said.

"Everyone kind of knew it. The park is full of wolves," he said, adding that four packs "kind of disappeared."

In Wyoming outside of Yellowstone, wildlife officials wiped out three packs for killing livestock, Bangs said. Excluding the park, his agency estimated 102 wolves in Wyoming, up from 89 last year.

Wildlife officials in Montana are investigating possible new packs, particularly in the western part of the state, Sime said.

Gray wolves were reintroduced to the region a decade ago and, in 2002, met the government's recovery targets. Still, the wolves remain federally protected — though, in parts of Montana and Idaho, ranchers now have greater latitude in protecting livestock from predatory wolves — because Wyoming hasn't submitted a management plan deemed acceptable by the federal agency, a necessary step before delisting can be proposed.

Bangs said he doubts there will be 1,000 wolves in the region when an official count is taken at year's end — September tends to be a big month for livestock predation, which often leads to problem wolves being killed. There also tends to be a spike in illegal wolf kills during the fall, when hunters are in the field.

In the future, Bangs said, the long-term average for the states likely will fall below 1,000 animals.
 
Is anyone really surprised by anything in that article? The only thing I didn't see was that they don't take into account those without collars. I really wish Wyoming would quit grandstanding, submit another plan and let us see if they really ever get delisted.
 
Yes, I think a lot of people must be surprised to find out the population increase may slow down. Don't you remember when the wolf population was growing 30% a year and we had idiots here claiming that, at that rate, we'd have 10,000 wolves in a few more years and millions of them eventually.

Of course, anyone with any brains knew the wolf population wouldn't keep increasing at the early rates.

Notice some of the names on my "Ignore" list if you wonder who thought we'd have a million wolves in Idaho by now. :D
 
Tone,
Where did it not consider the wolves without collars? I don't think they have 500 collars out there, nor do they have every wolf collared.
 
From some of my sources, if there isn't a collared individual in a pack, then it is an undocumented pack and thus not counted until one of them is collared. Of all the wolves I've seen in this state I have yet to see one with a collar. As it is we have seen much faster population growth rates than what were predicted and colonization into areas that "shouldn't" support wolves according to lots of literature, i.e. high road densities and proximity to people. I just want the things delisted and to actually be managed.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,599
Messages
2,026,330
Members
36,240
Latest member
Mscarl (she/they)
Back
Top