Advertisement

Finally some good news

You're welcome. Don't read too much into this question it's not a gotcha or anything. Would you support the use of thermal optics during rifle season for disabled hunters? Or maybe a disabled hunter allowed to use a scope during an otherwise primitive muzzeloader season with open sights?
Maybe in a different thread. Not this one. This thing has been a dumpster fire from the start. I’ve used compounds and crossbows extensively and hunted with multiple disabled folks going back decades. I’ve seen many of the challenges they face. I don’t think there’s many on this thread can match my experience level here.

I’ve made posts based on all that experience - most here disagree with my position. I’ve tried to provide thoughtful perspective on this thread. Nobody has asked me a question to better understand why I’m so firmly in favor of these opportunities and why I’m so disappointed by what happened in AZ. Most want to argue and disagree rather than understand.

Per the first post, disabled hunters will no longer be able to hunt with a crossbow in Arizona. Somebody literally just posted that there wasn’t any lost opportunity here. I would have to be some kind of stupid to try and convince/argue with that kind of special.

As a lifelong hunter, I’m truly embarrassed by this thread.

P.S. I’m not a fan of the way Wisconsin currently allows everyone to use a crossbow.
 
WTF . . . seriously? What about the abilities or disabilities of the person using the weapon? The argument holds a hell of a lot of water when you consider what an able bodied person can do with a compound versus what a paraplegic could do with a crossbow.

Disabled people using crossbows in archery season isn’t a problem. Enforcement of the laws on the books in AZ apparently is. And disabled hunters losing opportunities to get out and hunt is definitely a problem.
Couple things to consider, the first being the original intent of archery seasons.

There is a reason why it was allowed in the first place, mainly because it was supposed to be a more challenging way to hunt. Because of the challenge with becoming efficient/effective with equipment combined with the challenge of having to get close, SPECIAL seasons were adopted. Read again, SPECIAL archery only seasons. Meaning if you weren't willing to practice a lot, be willing to get close, and couldn't use the legal archery equipment...archery was not for you. In other words, you either cut the mustard or you hunt during rifle season.

The reason the lines are blurring and you're arguing your case is because archery equipment has advanced from having no impact to game and the overall experience, to having a very significant impact.

If there was no such thing as a crossbow, how would a disabled person participate with a recurve or longbow in a special archery season?

They wouldn't, they would have to use a rifle. Same as those unwilling or unable to master the primitive equipment that archery seasons were originally adopted for.

Make no mistake, archery hunting has veered way out in the weeds to original intent. I agree with others that the jump from recurves and longbows to compounds was a bigger difference than a modern compound to crossbow.

That said, I don't blame any state for trying to move archery back to its original intent. Yeah, it excludes some handicapped people from archery hunting, but to say it takes them out of hunting or the opportunity to hunt is absolutely horseshit.

It does no such thing, that's what all weapon seasons are for.

Also, you seem to be wanting others to clean up the abusers and those gaming the systems, but you haven't mentioned anything you've done to address it.

I'm all about giving handicapped folks opportunities, but not if helping a handful of people is going to compromise opportunities for everyone else.

Like I said, I'm much more inclined to identify those people that truly are handicapped and focusing on helping them specifically, rather than broad brush approaches that allow massive abuses that impact opportunities for everyone and the wildlife in a negative way.
 
My stance on crossguns hasn’t changed. Ever. And it never will.

Before crossbows were legal in Pennsylvania, it was actually ridiculously easy for somebody to go to the doctor and say their shoulder was hurting and get a note to be able to use a crossbow. It was being abused rampantly across the state. I think that’s why the state finally just threw their hands up and said here you go, now all of you babies can participate…

Now 75% of “bow hunters” are hunting with a crossbow and buck harvest with “Archery tackle” has quadrupled.

Crossbows have ruined the intent of archery in that state and many others. I watched it all unfold. It still sickens me.

I would love to see crossbows banned in all archery seasons for everyone and I mean everyone. If you can’t draw a bow, hunt the gun season and if you can’t shoot a gun, maybe hunting just isn’t for you.
 
we need to do what’s right and a have a Middle Ages themed season where crossbows are legal. Maybe it should be during calving season so the deer and elk are easier to hit. Bludgeoning weapons are legal too but of period appropriate cloths must be worn.
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Forum statistics

Threads
113,938
Messages
2,038,601
Members
36,403
Latest member
Hereinaz
Back
Top