Nick87
Well-known member
You'd see a lot of numbers drop off imo.Still have a numbers problem. But I don't disagree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'd see a lot of numbers drop off imo.Still have a numbers problem. But I don't disagree.
Agree, but not 100%. People use scam doctors to get drugs, too.AZ was issuing the 'illegal' disability permits. AZ could easily fix that and still allow hunters who cannot physically shoot a bow to use x bow without magnifying optics, to hunt during archery. It was not easy to get my disability x bow authorization here in CO, I needed a signed form from my Dr. He consulted the regs before signing my permit. If AZ doesn't trust Drs to be honest they should firm up the regs on what specifically constitutes x bow eligibility, then designate specific Drs with training on the topic and make permit seekers go through only those Drs. There is a flavor of kneejerk reaction against genuinely handicapped archers in this, just because the state didn't do it's due diligence in their handicap permitting process.
Too many doctors would sign anything without recognizing the consequences. And too many hunters would use anything to make it easier. They probably have handicapped parking permits too.Agree, but not 100%. People use scam doctors to get drugs, too.
I say let's quit mule deer hunting in the rut.like getting mule deer hunting in the rut.
Nobody on Rokslide would kill anything. mtmuleyCan you imagine the game numbers/and trophy quality if rifle season was open sights, muzzleloader was sidelock, and archery was stick and string. Not to mention the oppurtunity it would provide for all of us in the number of tags that would be available. People don't want oppurtunity though they want to fill a tag as easily as possible. I say this as a guy who shoots a 15x scope, an in line muzzleloader and a compound bow. I would be in overwhelming favor of it though if we could pull that off.
TypoI say let's quit mule deer hunting in the rut.
See, you're not looking at it right. Why is all the emphasis on the state controlling it? The people had a chance to do the right thing and not game the system and they failed. No one wants bigger government so the next best step is to not allow the gaming of the system. You're like everyone else and looking out for yourself which is normal and to be expected.AZ was issuing the 'illegal' disability permits. AZ could easily fix that and still allow hunters who cannot physically shoot a bow to use x bow without magnifying optics, to hunt during archery. It was not easy to get my disability x bow authorization here in CO, I needed a signed form from my Dr. He consulted the regs before signing my permit. If AZ doesn't trust Drs to be honest they should firm up the regs on what specifically constitutes x bow eligibility, then designate specific Drs with training on the topic and make permit seekers go through only those Drs. There is a flavor of kneejerk reaction against genuinely handicapped archers in this, just because the state didn't do it's due diligence in their handicap permitting process.
I would, especially if they could've waited a year or two or whatever to hunt archery season with a bow. Little discipline never hurt anyone. Instant gratification isn't what I'm looking for with my kids and hunting. Also what do knee surgeries have to do with switching to a crossbow?also wonder how many hunters would complain if a youth hunter who has never been exposed to the outdoors finds success with a crossbow?
No. Not all. In fact the complete opposite.Are you saying this a bad move?
Meh. Sure appreciate your over opinionated assumptions!Likely a knee-jerk ideological reaction to any comment regarding a "government" decision at any level. Uncontrollable reaction to criticize the "gubment" at any opportunity ... logical, rational or not. Stretching the elasticity of "crossbows" to "natural resources". Pathetic, but unfortunately it's prevalent. Try to view it as absurdly humorous.
Not to mention more handsome and well endowed.Thank-you.
Yes, Nick87 is much more objective, thoughtful, and polite.
I'm looking at it from the perspective of a hunter who had to quit archery because of shoulder injuries, then legally took advantage of CO's disability process to get permitted to hunt w x bow during CO archery season. We are the hunters these laws were made for. Why should we lose our legal privilege because scammers jump on poorly written and enforced legislation? ADA is a federal law requiring accommodations to those with disabilities, especially by gov't agencies. All laws have to account for abuse by scammers, this one is no different. Are you really advocating for taking away hunting opportunities from genuinely disabled hunters? Then you are looking at it wrong.See, you're not looking at it right. Why is all the emphasis on the state controlling it? The people had a chance to do the right thing and not game the system and they failed. No one wants bigger government so the next best step is to not allow the gaming of the system. You're like everyone else and looking out for yourself which is normal and to be expected.