cgasner1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 3,038
Your invited who you think we getting the honey holes from
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your invited who you think we getting the honey holes from
I'll get you on the best deer in the state, guaranteed. If you don't mind criminal trespass.Your invited who you think we getting the honey holes from
Birds?I’m talking way east. We are going out of state to flood them. I’ll donate a week you pick the state. Nothing over a 3 point though gotta keep it fair
This is sounding better and betterBirds?
You're going to be disappointed.This is sounding better and better
Numbers may be down but I only need two or three to make my tripYou're going to be disappointed.
Last wild pheasant I saw was in 1995 iirc.Dead serious.Numbers may be down but I only need two or three to make my trip
I owned property in the western part of the 700 zone right on the Musselshell river that we purchased, 1980, many years ago. There were always lots of WT around and easy to take. Never drew an elk tag for the 410 zone but hunted with friends that drew. I was hunting WT for meat. We sold the property before it became an interstate roads corridor. I hunted the 410 zone on Block Management property. The land owners put up signs that stated no vehicular traffic beyond this point. TOO many ignored these signs creating hazards for hunting and rancher working. I did my scouting days prior to opening day. Knew where the travel corridors were. Sat on stand early, only to have Cabelas cowboys walk in with their collective heads planted firmly in their anal cavities. This happened two days in a row. The hunters, whether resident or nonresident, seems little to care. It became a safety issue when these were aimlessly walking around in open fields with no respect. Guess it must be me. But, I will not encroach upon another who is set up early to hunt an area. My rant. MTGI’m surprised it is still that crowded with only 105 total mule deer tags and elk tags being cut back. Didn’t think anyone went there to whitetail hunt. Not sure I’ve even seen a whitetail on the public land that I’ve hunted in that area. Unless a lot of people don’t know that it is a draw tag now?
Pretty crazy is an understatement it’s a flat out show and the desperation with the western Montanans and non residents to fill tags due to the resource being depleted was asinine! My buddy owns a bunch of property and he turned so many people in this year for doing illegal stuff because they couldn’t find deer on public land! He flew one day and some dumb asses from Washington were camped on his property after they drove through the no trespassing signs. A big change is needed for sure and hopefully it happensDon’t leave region 6 out of this. Lol. Pretty crazy anymore.
I'm not understanding exactly why NR think they are subsidizing public land and access, that shit pays for itself.
The problem with state transfer is a large amount of states are just going to surplus that land and sell it. There is a reason people (rich people) want state transfer, so they can get really expensive, resource rich land for cheap. It is infinitely easier to sell state land that federal land.Interesting. So that means that states should have no problem funding/managing state land should the feds transfer it to them, correct?
I was under the impression that would be an impossible lift for them to pay for fire control etc…
This issue has been debated, explained, and settled on HUNT TALK so many times. Perhaps we should appoint BUZZ or another knowledgeable HTer to monitor and whenever someone seems to be in support of PLT, then just take them to the "woodshed" and move on from this sordid topic.The problem with state transfer is a large amount of states are just going to surplus that land and sell it. There is a reason people (rich people) want state transfer, so they can get really expensive, resource rich land for cheap. It is infinitely easier to sell state land that federal land.
Not to mention that the land was never the "states" in the first place, as the federal govt purchased the land via the Louisiana Purchase before any of those states were, you know, states.
Added edit: Ultimately, given what states have previously done with their state land allocations, a majority of it would be sold. Also, imagine if WY had all federal land within it's borders transferred to state lands. You can't camp on state lands in WY. How does that improve hunting for NR? Similar laws apply in other states, including CO, where access is determined by the lessee.
Hey, when I am recreating, I don't like bullets flying by and besides, I want my federal land that is unhuntable to me, to be making my life better, producing oil, Lithium, cheap beef and lumber, etc. etc. If I'm not hunting it I want it making "stuff" for me.
See where that goes? I don't need your state game animals on my federal property.
Exactly, and we now have that administration. The next 4 yrs will be the death sentence for federal public.I see where it goes. Maybe we don’t like your federal property in our state. It only takes the right administration in the White House to decide that it’s time to change the laws that have 648 million acres of property in the United States changed from federal ownership to state ownership of the land within state borders….
I don’t think hunters would like the effects of opening Pandora’s can of worms…..