Elitist Communist Spin?

BigHornyRam

New member
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
433
Location
T Falls, MT
Check out this article and let me know what you think.

Paul

When Gary Ferguson set out on foot from his home in Red Lodge for the most remote place in the continental United States, he did so expecting to spend the next 11 weeks in considerable silence and solitude.

What he found was "as close to Grand Central Station as you can get."

From his perch in an old guard station called Hawks Rest, Ferguson chronicled the parade of humanity across the highlands in the southeastern corner of Yellowstone National Park.




Wannabe cowboys swaggered past a dozen at a time, greedy outfitters thumbed their nose at his - and all - authority, inner-city youths looked for a moment's peace in their otherwise tumultuous lives, park rangers tried in vain to enforce long-neglected rules, and wildlife biologists struggled to protect both the land and animals.

The Thorofare, as this piece of Yellowstone was nicknamed years ago, is "a kind of sanatorium for the disenfranchised, a way station for men riding and hiding spring to fall to escape whatever curses they imagine hovering in the culture at large," Ferguson wrote. "In these upper meadows of the Yellowstone is testosterone enough to light the woods on fire."

Ferguson's account of his not-so-solitary summer was just published by National Geographic Adventure Press; he'll talk about "Hawks Rest: A Season in the Remote Heart of Yellowstone" and read excerpts during two appearances Wednesday in Missoula.

National Geographic provided the "most remote" designation by asking its mapmakers to find the slice of wilderness farthest from a road. That place - the Thorofare - is just 28 miles from a road.

"I went into the project intrigued by the notion of writing a personal portrait of this most remote place," Ferguson said in a telephone interview. "I wanted to assess the integrity of the ecosystem, and imagine - if possible - what might be the great threats in the coming years."

And there was wildlife aplenty: grizzly bears, the Delta wolf pack, streams thick with native trout, the grandest trophy elk in the Lower 48. Ferguson and his traveling companion, 68-year-old LaVoy Tolbert, got an eyeful of magnificent animals.

But oh, did they have a lot of human company as well.

"Beautiful as it may be, this most remote place in the Lower 48 is by far the busiest slice of backcountry either of us have ever seen," Ferguson wrote. "Most days it feels as though we've stumbled onto a colossal family reunion - short on kids, long on lunatic relatives."

And the commotion wasn't anything new, he later learned. Forest Service ranger Gordon Reese reported contacting an average of 100 people a week in the same area 25 years earlier - and close to 400 horses and mules.

Another ranger from the same era capped his year-end report with this rant: "What they need up here is a platoon of Marines and a few heads knocked together."

The attraction, Ferguson learned, were the miles and miles of highland meadows - perfect not only for migrating animals, but for outfitter-led forays into the wilderness. Week after week, he recorded the parade of visitors, making special note of how their dispositions changed after even a few days in the Thorofare.

As did his.

"I have to say that despite the comings and goings, I still found the land to be overwhelmingly dynamic and so whole as far as the diversity of species and general health of the ecosystem," Ferguson said. "I found a very vibrant and vital ecosystem that on any given day was more than enough to thrill me and give me hope."

And there were, among the throngs, several families who had come into the Thorofare every summer for the past 20 or 25 years, he said. "They had a sense of history and memory attached to that place. You could watch the magic of that wilderness work on them. They became young again."

His job now, Ferguson said, is to share the magic with readers in hopes that they might protect the area from development. "I am worried," he said. "I truly and deeply believe that with some of the proposed changes happening with the Bush administration, what right now seems so wonderful could erode very quickly."

His summer in "the greater Yellowstone of lore," is out of sight, Ferguson said, "but almost never out of mind."
 
I don't see spin, I see the truth that being far from a road doesn't constitute 'remoteness'. That is what Nat. Parks are for. If you want the Elitist Communist Spin, talk to the Park Rangers!
wink.gif
 
I will have to look at some maps, but I can't believe 28 miles is the most remote spot in wilderness in the lower 48. Seems like there are some other places to look at in Idahome.

Part of it is the National Park designation. They have done studies up in Idahome on the Sawtooth NRA and Hells Canyon NRA, and they have decided to leave them at NRA status (Nat'l Recreation Area), as the visitor count greatly increases with the Nat'l Park Designation.

Kind of makes a Wilderness within a National Park be a bit of an Oxymoron.

elkgrin.gif
er
 
I don't buy the idea that he went to an area known as the "thorofar" to find solitude. That aint the most remote area in the lower 48, look in the frank church.

He went there looking for mass degredation of the wilds. He's still looking for it because nowhe's "worried" the administrationis going to allow developement interestsin there(?)
 
I travel cross country, (not as much as I'd like) and have found that even a few miles away from roads, one can hit these places of solitude that so many yearn for, most think that the farther away you get from any thing civilized, the closer to these places one can get. I find that is really not true, my findings are that you can find these feelings no matter where you go, if you know where to look and mentaly how to get there...
Most places I have been, I find a few signs of mans pressence, but most of that is from long day's gone by. I very rarly see any thing modern or people for that matter, the elk are usually not spooky, and the deer will look at you from forty yards with out turning inside out and disappearing into the wood work.
Remoteness is in the mind and what you are actually looking for...
smile.gif
 
Just where does Communism fit into the equation here? Maybe he was drinking vodka and I just missed it.
tongue.gif


The guy got a magazine assignment to visit the so-called "most remote" place in the CONUS as defined by the magazine. He went, he reported what he saw (albeit a little sarcastically). He editorialized a bit, but no more than any other journalist. No biggies in my view!
confused.gif
 
The irony is he went to the Thorofare for solitude. That's like going to the Turnpike to use the crosswalk.
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
I still think they went there looking for wasted wilderness.
 
Dgibson,

The tip off that he's communist is the "greedy outfitter" spin. Now here's the capitalist spin. "The hardworking outfitter taking clients seaking a pristine wilderness experience, thus providing the local economy with much needed revenue". How's that for spin. He also would like you to believe that he is a more desearving visitor since he walked in and did not use horses. Wonder how the food that fed him all summer came in? In the end he could not resist taking a shot at President Bush, since he stands for everything the author opposes. He would like everyone to believe that Bush wants to develope the Thorofare. I guess there are a few people out there that gulable.

Paul

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 05-01-2003 10:51: Message edited by: Paul C ]</font>
 
Ah. So the next time you have to pay your mechanic $50 for a $3 part you won't call him greedy, you'll just say he's a "hard working automobile maintenance technician providing a needed service to willing individuals and adding revenue to the local economy." Any other opinion or thought means you're a Communist.
rolleyes.gif
I think you read too much into a few words. Maybe he just thinks they're pricks and can't say it in print.
wink.gif
 
Dgibson,

The only way I'ld be a willing participant if my mechanic wanted to charge me $50 for a $3 part is if he threw in a case of vasoline with the deal.

Paul
 
Good call Paul...
A buisness man has to charge what he has to charge to keep the doors open, if the price becomes more than the local market will pay, the individual will be looking for a line of work, if the person paying the price feels that a $3 part is worth $50 to instal it, well then I guess a deal would be struck. The mechanic isn't into what he is doing so that he can help his fellow man to become a better more fulfilled person. There are a lot of other buisness's to shop at or you can put the part in yourself and save the $47...
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
 
So then those people who refuse to pay $50 for the $3 part are communists because they think the mechanic is greedy?
 
No! The word that comes to mind is Semantics, and it seems that there is a lot of it that goes on here to keep the arguments alive...
wink.gif
 
Back
Top