Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just look at the pictures.
I do have to comment on one article I recently took the time to read. It was titled "super tuning you bow". Without a doubt it was the lamest attempt at offering tech advice ever. It didn't even explain simple bow tuning but did mention a few simple types.
Sadly just another subscription I will let die. I grew up loving outdoor magazines but don't currently know of one that I am impressed with. I guess too much free info on the web could be to blame...
The MRS section in Eastman's is largely taken from state information. There is no way that Eastman's can research every little bit of hunting area. Keep it in perspective. It is a place where someone can get an overview of western hunting without having to do ALL of the research themselves. They do have good stories about average people that kill very large animals, whether it be guided or unguided.
As far as the other articles, take them for what they are worth. If you can use some of the information, then take it. If not, then go on. Every other hunting/shooting magazine or TV show is the same. I see stupid stuff all the time on TV. I saw Dick Metcalf (self-proclaimed expert) say some really stupid stuff about the .308 one day.
Bottom line is if you don't like the magazine, then drop it, but don't whine about it.
The MRS section in Eastman's is largely taken from state information.
This is very true. The disclaimer in every MRS says that it is only a place to get you started.
I for one would never take the word of any magazine as being absolute. I always do my own research and if something gets screwed up it's my own fault.
One thing that really amazes me is how many of you guys will sit in front of your computers and badmouth Eastman's. I am wondering why you don't go on that forum and tell them directly.
I overheard some old ladies in the mall bitching about recipes printed wrong in Good Housekeeping - said they were gonna boycott good housekeeping. It's a damn magazine ladies - who could possibly give a crap.
Perhaps I have also been too honest over there. I have not been able to get on the site for several days now.LOL! I guess you didn't read that I did exactly that and I got banned from making further posts on their Forums. A lot of the other member's posts were then deleted that backed me up and then suddenly the two main threads where everyone was registering their complaints about getting screwed out of their money and wanting the MRS put back on that they had paid for were suddenly gone! I hope nobody that reads it goes by it, as there are so many errors in each issue like everyone here is mentioning that it's a waste of money if you are just paying for that one particular part as a subscriber. Just this one thread has had approximately 40 people with the same negative opinion and most that are now subscribers appear to be saying they have not renewed or are not going to when the time comes. I might not be able to say anything more out on their website, but I'm sure not sugar coating the royal screwing they gave everyone any time I get the opportunity on other sites when their name is brought up! I'd bet they are going to lose their butts over this and that screwed up digital conversion they just went to way before all the bugs were worked out.
I overheard some old ladies in the mall bitching about recipes printed wrong in Good Housekeeping - said they were gonna boycott good housekeeping. It's a damn magazine ladies - who could possibly give a crap.
Eastman's, aren't they the company that makes baseball bats?