Colorado sheep, goat & moose....

I did the math on another forum for the next three years and need to look it up. Literally thousands, as @Khunter said, and they are putting in for very few tags. Crazy thing is that points were only a couple bucks when I started (and you had to float tag fees). I think a year of sheep, moose and goats points with a shot at drawing was less than $20/year. Now for a shot at M/S/G it will run you about $400/year...for raffle-type odds, with not a ton to show for long-term loyalty. Max points won't be worth much when two or three hundred extra people put in for the tag, each year, for the next few years and beyond

I am at 3-16 on sheep and less for goat since I drew a while back. (I have some moose points but odds were bad enough before that I never thought I would draw anyway.) With weighted points and nothing squared, it pretty much turns what was likely an eventuality for some guys to get a sheep tag to a complete crap shoot.

Colorado executed the "bait and switch" to perfection.
 
Here is the math unless I entered something wrong in my calculator...I did this right after 2020 draw.

SHEEP
- 3554 NR applicants who could have drawn this year
- 5138 additional NR who will be able to draw in 3 more years

GOAT
- 2021 NR applicants who could have drawn this year
- 3895 additional NR who will be able to draw in 3 more years
 
5790 residents had 2+0 going into last years draw...that will dilute the previous number of qualified apps.
I see 3335 R's with 2+0

PP only apps are included in the Draw totals on page 1 (since S-P-999-99-P is one of the 128 hunt codes for sheep)

Either way - if trends hold and ~80% of people continue, we would expect 1400 new R applicants in the eligible pool this year. Which is about 2X normal from recent years.


Screen Shot 2021-02-13 at 6.22.12 PM.png
 
I see 3335 R's with 2+0

PP only apps are included in the Draw totals on page 1 (since S-P-999-99-P is one of the 128 hunt codes for sheep)

Either way - if trends hold and ~80% of people continue, we would expect 1400 new R applicants in the eligible pool this year. Which is about 2X normal from recent years.


View attachment 173935
🤷‍♂️1/1000 or 1/2000 I’m not drawing... glad CPW is getting more $ hopefully they put some of that towards MSG.
 
🤷‍♂️1/1000 or 1/2000 I’m not drawing... glad CPW is getting more $ hopefully they put some of that towards MSG.
I know - but it's February (and a holiday weekend so we can't even Ski unless we want to be subjected to the Jerry Army), so I prefer to fret and build spreadsheets over tenths of percentage points on tags I won't draw.
 
I know - but it's February (and a holiday weekend so we can't even Ski unless we want to be subjected to the Jerry Army), so I prefer to fret and build spreadsheets over tenths of percentage points on tags I won't draw.
Are you guys sure your not the same person?
 
Na @cedahm is actually wicked smaat I just pretend to be
I’m in consulting...pretending to be wicked smaat is like half the job description.

But back on-topic: If I were a NR interested in CO Moose or Sheep (and probably Goats), I'd think hard about stopping @ 3+0 and putting that $100 point fee to work on the RMBS raffle or something like that.

In consulting-eze, after that, the Juice likely isn't worth the squeeze.

I still think it's worth it as a resident, but will watch the next couple years closely.
 
I see 3335 R's with 2+0

PP only apps are included in the Draw totals on page 1 (since S-P-999-99-P is one of the 128 hunt codes for sheep)

Either way - if trends hold and ~80% of people continue, we would expect 1400 new R applicants in the eligible pool this year. Which is about 2X normal from recent years.


View attachment 173935
Yep, my bad, somehow i thought the pref pt only apps were separate from the page 1 totals. Now it makes no sense for me to have thought that. LOL
 
Food for thought....youth receive no preference in m/s/g. Unless I'm missing something, their application is thrown in the pot with everyone else. That's another 835 R's with 2+0 heading into the sheep draw this year at 3+0. Historically, about 50% of 3+0 to 3+3 applicants apply for a point only. So, we got that going for us...
 
Food for thought....youth receive no preference in m/s/g. Unless I'm missing something, their application is thrown in the pot with everyone else. That's another 835 R's with 2+0 heading into the sheep draw this year at 3+0. Historically, about 50% of 3+0 to 3+3 applicants apply for a point only. So, we got that going for us...
way to pile on, Debbie downer...but good catch.

I am surprised at the level of continuance from the 2018 free for all. I would have guessed more like 25% would have continued paying the $50. It was more like 40%.

If trends hold (~72% of applicants continue from 0->3 - in, admittedly, a very small sample size) - we should expect ~3000 Resident 3+0 applicants in 2021.

R' Apps Only32100->3 continue
2020
1538​
4170​
3163​
3176​
73%​
2019
1167​
1656​
5194
2118​
65%​
2018
1472​
1717​
2357​
12272
78%​
2017
1106​
1371​
1481​
2109​
2016
1093​
1172​
1518​
1801​
2015
1010​
1196​
1342​
1889​
 
How does CO distribute NR tags? Is there a specific pool set aside for NR's or is it just up to a certain percentage with none "guaranteed"?
 
How does CO distribute NR tags? Is there a specific pool set aside for NR's or is it just up to a certain percentage with none "guaranteed"?
Depends on the species. For deer & elk, there’s a very generous “up to 35%” for most units and “up to 20%” for some of the units that have had more resident demand, historically. For antelope, there is no resident/nonresident differentiation. For sheep & moose & mountain goat, there’s a specific set-aside for nonresidents. And bear tags are like party favors at an 8-year-old’s birthday celebration. They practically give those things away.
 
Back
Top