Climate Change
- Thread starter Panda Bear
- Start date
BigHornRam
Well-known member
"Renewable" energy mandates and big subsidies make putting solar farms in bad places, lucrative for those putting them in, not to mention lucrative for the panel manufacturers. Whether or not they save the planet, only time will tell.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
William's are way over objective and we need to do something about it.
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Shoulder seasons?
BigHornRam
Well-known member
If that's what it takes......
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
OTC in Co but it’s gonna be expensive
Are objectives based on carrying capacity or social tolerance?
BigHornRam
Well-known member
Both. William's are big eaters and PITA's.
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Gotta keep’em in check so they don’t devastate the local IPA supply.
The problem is the damn liberals love them...
Bigjay73
Well-known member
Reminds me of the winter of 614 B.C.Last day of January. 50 and rain today a stones throw from Canada.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
The population of wolves in the west increases and the sky is falling because they are now ruining the land scape.
The worlds human population increses about 500% in the last 100 years from 1.6 to 8 billion and the same crowd says that isnt effecting our climate and environment.
The worlds human population increses about 500% in the last 100 years from 1.6 to 8 billion and the same crowd says that isnt effecting our climate and environment.
Last edited:
thusby
Well-known member
I didn’t have have children so if I want.... I can righteously burn 20,000 acres of rainforest and most people can’t say nothin! 
noharleyyet
Well-known member
I didn’t have have children so if I want.... I can righteously burn 20,000 acres of rainforest and most people can’t say nothin!
...and refuse to contract the plague.
devon deer
Well-known member
Easily resolved just more of these little operations need to be carried out, see latest thread https://www.hunttalk.com/threads/my-wife-is-funny.295661/
tarheel
Well-known member
But Richard, then comes the real dilemma; what criteria is used to determine who gets snipped? Do we determine it on a percentage basis or target certain prolific cultures or religions or economic groups? Maybe we should use IQ as a determinant, or certain genetic traits, or maybe incorporate a lottery, or maybe the results of "Peak Oil" will eventually sort it all out and save the earth......oh woe is us.Easily resolved just more of these little operations need to be carried out, see latest thread https://www.hunttalk.com/threads/my-wife-is-funny.295661/
ExactlyI didn’t have have children so if I want.... I can righteously burn 20,000 acres of rainforest and most people can’t say nothin!
I can drive my v8, live in my desert house with a pool and big AC unit and eat steak and commute to work, and I’ll still have a smaller carbon footprint than the vegan, wholistic, tiny house dwelling, at home gardening, rainwater catching, mommy of 8 YouTube blogger that only dresses her kids in re-threaded 4th generation Patagonia hand me downs.
Nobody has a smaller footprint than the person that doesn’t exist.
If you ask me, it’s time to do away with child tax credits, which are just subsidies for poor people to have carbon generating kids they can’t afford that ruin the planet, and give them to those of us that are part of the overpopulation and climate crisis solution
Similar threads
