noharleyyet
Well-known member
Don't be so sure that the continual attacks on the 1st amendment & free press are going to save the GOP from their rightful fate.
Ben, the press is only 'free' for your 'identity'...24/7...no charge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't be so sure that the continual attacks on the 1st amendment & free press are going to save the GOP from their rightful fate.
Some pretty good suggestions buried in teh 30 pages of Lawnboys thread. Bottom line, make it a hard target. But everyone would rather argue about guns.
That didn’t even come close to answering the questions.
Then you didn't read it all.
So it goes.
Here is a suggestion, and merely that:
Start a new thread with only realistic suggestions of what you would do, right now, to put a
stop to the school shooting.
Save the rants, just suggestions. i.e put a retired politician at each entrance to the schools, metal detectors, etc
Now, back to ordering more ammo........
These shootings would have been solved long ago cept political correctness won't let it.
I could care less if they give me a background check for ammo.... In Minnesota, at least my experience, it takes a whole 5 minutes. What would suck is a limit on shotgun shells, especially when I buy 500 at a time for the spring conservation hunt. If it was a limit for centerfire rifles I could care less, I have no application for 500 rounds but maybe some of you competition guys might....
No, I didn’t go back and read 30 pages. I figured anyone who makes a statement like this
Would be able to easily provide a summary and/or explanation of said statement. I must be mistaken.
Carry on.
As official summarizer, I shall repost the summerization:hump:
From post #39
Some pretty good suggestions buried in teh 30 pages of Lawnboys thread. Bottom line, make it a hard target. But everyone would rather argue about guns.
These shootings would have been solved long ago cept political correctness won't let it.
I asked my initial question because I was genuinely interested in your ideas and what you were referring to when you stated this
At least now you have confirmed for me I’m wasting my time with any further inquiries. What a stimulating interchange....
Single payer means more money in your pocket. Your basic health needs are met through collective purchasing & negotiating (that's the free market at work, btw). You can still purchase supplemental insurance for your viagra and boob jobs if you want it, like Canada. There is no example of a purely capitalistic healthcare regime. None. It doesn't exist. If it did exist, we'd not have literally every other industrialized nation going to some form of nationalized healthcare. It's cheaper, it saves taxpayers much more money, and it helps ensure people like Nicola Cruz get the help they need because we eliminate the biggest single factor that people have with getting healthcare, mental or otherwise - COST.
You're being purposely obtuse. You know exactly what he is saying. Harden the target to take away the opportunity. Someone will use a truck full of fuel and fertilizer, and then you will want to take away trucks and freedom to buy gasoline. Or machetes. Or baseball bats.
Barely made it past "health care is a human right", my progressive revolutionary.
Socialized medicine. Indeed.
The myth of our Canadian friends having to wait for health care. Nicely glossed over. I have had friends of mine come over the border
for MRI's (to find internal bleeding) because they were told the wait was 9 month to get in.
Didn't make it to the part about payment. I was paying "my fair share", or so I thought. Then YOUR savior decided my "fair share" was about 3 times more. Making me pay for people who
who make poor choices regarding their health and upkeep will never fly with me, my egalitarian radical.
We will have to agree to disagree.
At least until you try to see it my way https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qyclqo_AV2M
I've got team members in US, Canada and various western European locales. I have team members go back and forth between jurisdictions regularly. I deal with the real world cost of service and type of service every day. It is very simple, Europe and Canada save money, not because of bargaining power or efficiency (which shouldn't be surprising as there are very few examples of government programs being efficient) but because they ration care. (I am not talking about death squads). I have a team member's wife who had to wait 8 months (for a new fiscal year) to get a simple back/disc surgery you can get the same week in the US. She couldn't work or care for her kids for 6 of those months and her husband had to take family leave - the overall societal, economic and human costs were huge. All my non-US team members think the US is backwards on this issue -- until a few of them get to spend a year here and they are really pissed when they get back home.
This is of course anecdotal, but it is none the less a real experience -- and the nature of the savings, rationing and denial of modern improvements, are how Europe saves costs -- and maybe that is where we need to go before the country goes bankrupt. But let's be honest about it -- you will not get the same type of care under a Euro-system -- or, "you will definitely not get to keep your plan".
We absolutely ration health care and we absolutely have extended wait times in the U.S. For crying out loud - My dentist has a 4 month wait list.
Not even close to comparable - you compare convenience timing vs major medical. I am guessing that if you cracked a tooth and were in agonizing pain, your dentist would fit you in within 24 hours or would find you another dentist who could.
3, 2...