D
Deleted member 38069
Guest
This is starting to derail a bit.
Through the replies so far, my revised question is not about ethics but more about why we don't call one way sport hunting and the other way sustenance hunting, and not try to combine the two? Is it to make it more tolerable to society?
Or rather, if you took antlers/horns out of hunting but kept the meat would you still go?
If you took meat out but kept the antlers would you still go?
Some of you are taking this too personally and are getting defensive. I'm just saying call a spade a spade!
Through the replies so far, my revised question is not about ethics but more about why we don't call one way sport hunting and the other way sustenance hunting, and not try to combine the two? Is it to make it more tolerable to society?
Or rather, if you took antlers/horns out of hunting but kept the meat would you still go?
If you took meat out but kept the antlers would you still go?
Some of you are taking this too personally and are getting defensive. I'm just saying call a spade a spade!