Nick87
Well-known member
I wish. I couldn't believe it.The bill was a joke, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish. I couldn't believe it.The bill was a joke, right?
State park. I did get to see photos of the nice buck the bartender shot with her bow.Jeezus! Ten bucks? Are you camping in an airport terminal?
Section 5.3I dunno, but I’m fairly certain the neuroscientists will tell you there is no amount of good alcohol, period. Forget the cardiologists and such.
What I’ve mostly heard of late is that alcohol, from anything, is alcohol, and it only does negative things to your body, on every level that it interacts with your body.
From what I assume, all the studies saying one drink, or whatever rate it is, from anything, has positive benefits are correlative and are likely just showing that people with higher levels of discipline have better health outcomes.
This debunking is news to me. Apparently I missed the memo. Along with the rest of the Internet and the national institute of health
Moderate Wine Consumption and Health: A Narrative Review - PMC
Although it is clearly established that the abuse of alcohol is seriously harmful to health, much epidemiological and clinical evidence seem to underline the protective role of moderate quantities of alcohol and in particular of wine on health. This ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In conclusion, wine differs from other alcoholic beverages and its moderate consumption not only does not increase the risk of chronic degenerative diseases but is also associated with health benefits.
This^ keeps the perspective.*As I drive one handed, on the cell phone calling the bros while eating a Wendy's spicy chicken, large fry, and a coke, chased with a junior bacon cheeseburger*
"Bro I'm telling you Huberman said drinking is the worst thing you could ever do. Don't even do it bro. Not once.
We still hitting that ice bath later?"
Most of the studies I've read lump either all alcohol together or all drinking together, including that oncology study. Which in my reading is really concluding that alcohol can be negative in so many ways that you are best off leaving it alone. That is an entirely different determination than all alcohol in all doses is bad for you.That is a very interesting meta-analysis.
I think Huberman and others are chiefly talking about the last 30 years of resveratrol claims in regard to red wine. Those are what are front and center in my mind and articles I’ve read since I was a kid. I don’t want to post another clip but this one is short and he talked a little bit about it.
The world health organization made a statement recently that no amount of alcohol is safe for human consumption.
This little Lancet article does a good job explains why, setting things up, and also references the meta-analysis you posted:
The American society of clinical oncology put out a statement that even lite drinking, increases your cancer risk.
I believe everything is a trade-off. I think of myself if I were to like red wine and the trade-off I would be engaging in nightly would be drinking a Pepsi’s worth of calories. That alone would be something tough for me to consider.
In that short clip I posted above Huberman talks about how the benefit of stress reduction could potentially offset any negative affects, The Shining being a an extreme example. It also seems, in that meta-analysis you posted, that the the benefits observed in observational studies seem to be interacting with the diet of those studied. Which makes sense.
In all of these studies and statements, because they are all essentially observational. There’s a lot of “may”, “could”, “seem”, “suggested”. I suppose it would be very difficult to do a study otherwise.
Debunked was probably too strong of a word. The wife and I are going out to breakfast this morning and I am having a Caesar.
Hasn't living longer in general produced as much negative?Most of the studies I've read lump either all alcohol together or all drinking together, including that oncology study. Which in my reading is really concluding that alcohol can be negative in so many ways that you are best off leaving it alone. That is an entirely different determination than all alcohol in all doses is bad for you.
The more I consume science the more polarizing I find it. The less consistent I find it. Hence the value of meta data reviews. Which I'll admit are still fairly undecided, but i'd argue is still a long way from being "debunked."
Below discusses the two sides
Alcohol, Drinking Pattern, and Chronic Disease - PMC
This review discusses the inconsistent recommendations on alcohol consumption and its association with chronic disease, highlighting the need for an evidence-based consensus. Alcohol is an addictive substance consumed worldwide, especially in ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov