MTLabrador
Well-known member
Why you gotta be hating on Johnny Cash like that?> total ban on music where the lyrics include violent gun crime or misuse of firearms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why you gotta be hating on Johnny Cash like that?> total ban on music where the lyrics include violent gun crime or misuse of firearms
And Marty Robbins......Why you gotta be hating on Johnny Cash like that?
So we can both agree that "highly regulated" doesn't seem to solve the problem?Maybe not conversationally, but legally alcohol is highly regulated - age limits, vendor licensing, time place and manner restrictions etc. (and historically there was prohibition)
While not pressure cookers, post OK City we have a lot more regulation and reporting around fertilizer purchases.
The bottom 3 would definitely invoke 1A questions, but since we all agree all constitutional rights are subject to regulation under appropriate scrutiny - "strict" in the case of 1A - these could theoretically fly. But personally, I am a near absolutist on the 1A. In my opinion, it is the one right that fundamentally distinguishes democracy from tyranny.> enforce our current gun laws
> schools need armed security
> total ban on violent "shoot-em up style video games"
> the illegal depicted use of firearms in movies should be viewed the same as violent sex and the film should receive a mature RRR/xxx type rating and revenue taxed at 10%
> total ban on music where the lyrics include violent gun crime or misuse of firearms
Under that theory every law promulgate by mankind has no purpose, since I don't think any law has full compliance, or solves all issues.So we can both agree that "highly regulated" doesn't seem to solve the problem?
I can't speak for others but here is my problem statement.
First, every day, with guns or not, millions of Americans struggle with unmet mental health needs. Not only these millions suffer, but a large multiple of these millions in the form of spouses, parents, kids, friends, neighbors, co-workers, etc also suffer alongside them. Americans can't seem to quit squabbling about far less compelling issues and petty politics long enough to meaningfully address.
Second, some urban areas and some rural areas have lost most social cohesion and any semblance of hope. This drives a concentration of gangs, drugs and associated violence. Economic opportunity is the only viable path out of this mess. But again, neither side seems willing to do the hard work beyond virtue signaling.
But once or twice a year an active shooter brings mental health to the headlines, as does skyrocketing gang violence in major cities. So, I would like to use society's obsession/fascination with these "black swans" to move on broader mental health and economic development initiatives. To bring some supporters along, a mixed bag of gun control tweaks (some a little tighter, some a little looser) might help push the discussion forward since public pressure to do "something about guns" is a powerful political motivator.
No, not at all. My point is gun laws are already "heavily regulated". We don't need more regulations, we need to enforce the ones we already have.Under that theory every law promulgate by mankind has no purpose, since I don't think any law has full compliance, or solves all issues.
Supreme Court ruled on one.@mtmiller
You can’t swear on TV without a FCC violation and fine. Why can’t the same be done for identifying and showing the shooter?
Both could be argued that they violate the 1st amendment, how is one any different than the other?
Cool, the point to ponder is why is it cool or okay in music to talk about killing people just for fun or because they made you a little mad?? They wouldn't write about molesting kids? Would they? Why is it socially accepted and why do these songs sell millions of copies???The bottom 3 would definitely invoke 1A questions, but since we all agree all constitutional rights are subject to regulation under appropriate scrutiny - "strict" in the case of 1A - these could theoretically fly. But personally, I am a near absolutist on the 1A. In my opinion, it is the one right that fundamentally distinguishes democracy from tyranny.
Cocaine blues has it all about covered...Why you gotta be hating on Johnny Cash like that?
If that was true
“And then I shot him full of holes from his nose to his knees and I polished off my little sweet pea!!!”Why you gotta be hating on Johnny Cash like that?
Damn good song though.“And then I shot him full of holes from his nose to his knees and I polished off my little sweet pea!!!”
It’s just so weird how as we get older as a society, we need more rules.
Just seems like it would go the other way.
I guess wisdom doesn’t come with age.
So……there is a line nowYes, I am listening to myself. My question to you is: Do you even understand the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, and why it was written the way it is? Your statement below makes me tend to believe that you don't.
Again, you need to understand the 2nd Amendment. Here's an example:
10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classes
(a)The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b)The classes of the militia are—
(1)
the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2)
the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
So here is the militia that the 2nd Amendment refers to. There are two classes of militia, Organized and Unorganized. Every US citizen between the ages of 17 and 45 fall into one of these two classes.
"A well regulated militia"... As written in the late 18th century "well regulated" was understood to mean "well supplied", that is to say had modern weaponry and equipment at his disposal. That definition has not changed. That means high capacity magazines, along with the most popular sporting rifle in America. "being necessary for the security of a free state"... This was to ensure that there was recourse to an oppressive government - such as what we endured during the American Revolution. The founding fathers wanted to make sure that the people were never allowed to be subjected to a government that oppress the people by taking away their weapons (see: "The Shot Heard Round The World"), "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". Again, see "The Shot Heard Round The World".
So, back to my "common sense" gun violence ideas, I have a very good understanding of what I'm saying. I want every criminal to wake up in the morning thinking "Is today going to be the last day of my life? Am I going to mug the wrong guy, otherwise known as THEY GOOD GUY WITH A GUN?". They will no longer have their soft targets such as these ridiculous "Gun Free Zones" to prey on. And if they do still feel the urge to try and harm, injure, or kill someone they better think twice because if they are caught and convicted - they're off the planet. AND I'M FINE WITH THAT. Why wouldn't you be?
You didn't answer my question...Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations
COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown has brought about a sense of fear and anxiety around the globe. This phenomenon has led to short term as well as long term psychosocial and mental health implications for children and adolescents. The quality and magnitude ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Google Scholar
scholar.google.com
Life Conditions during COVID-19 Lockdown and Mental Health in Spanish Adolescents
Spanish children were locked down for 72 days due to COVID-19, causing severe disruption to their normal life. The threat posed by COVID-19 continues and clinicians, administrators, and families need to know the life conditions associated with more psychological problems to modify them and...www.mdpi.com
Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations
COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown has brought about a sense of fear and anxiety around the globe. This phenomenon has led to short term as well as long t…www.sciencedirect.com
Research Update: Children’s Anxiety and Depression on the Rise
In a new article published last week in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers from the Health Resources and Services Administration find that anxiety and depression among children ages 3-17 have increased o…ccf.georgetown.edu
Depression And Anxiety Double In Youth Compared To Pre-Pandemic
A new meta-analysis from the University of Calgary, showing that depression and anxiety symptoms have doubled in children and adolescents globally when compared to pre-pandemic times.www.forbes.com
COVID-19 and Mental Health: A Growing Crisis
A spotlight from our 2021 State of Mental Health in America report. This report explores the data from the over 1.5 million people who took a screen through the MHA Online Screening Program from January to September 2020, to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health.mhanational.org
Caregiver Perceptions of Children’s Psychological Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic
This survey study examines the associations of school closure and exposure to COVID-19–related stressors with caregivers’ perceptions of their children’s mental well-being.jamanetwork.com
Addressing the Consequences of School Closure Due to COVID‐19 on Children's Physical and Mental Well‐Being
Prolonged school closures are one of the most disruptive forces in the COVID‐19 era. School closures have upended life for children and families, and educators have been forced to determine how to provide distance learning. Schools are also an ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19
This meta-analysis examines the global prevalence of clinically elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety in youth during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.jamanetwork.com
I agree there is ugly stuff out there, and I am not saying I like it, but, "you can take my typewriter out of my cold dead hands"Cool, the point to ponder is why is it cool or okay in music to talk about killing people just for fun or because they made you a little mad?? They wouldn't write about molesting kids? Would they? Why is it socially accepted and why do these songs sell millions of copies???
Who would pay for this? These are extremely costly things to apply, even costlier monitor and enforce> enforce our current gun laws
> schools need armed security
> total ban on violent "shoot-em up style video games"
> the illegal depicted use of firearms in movies should be viewed the same as violent sex and the film should receive a mature RRR/xxx type rating and revenue taxed at 10%
> total ban on music where the lyrics include violent gun crime or misuse of firearms
So……there is a line now
“Arms” could be anything from a rock to a nuclear weapon.
You can’t own a nuke now, so are your rights being “infringed”?
The Constitution is and always has been a living, breathing, amendable idea
The second “amendment” wasn’t there to begin with.
I’ll ask again, are we breaking the 2A by not allowing every citizen access to nukes?
HC mags, semi autos, etc can all be debated
I’m not the board certified physicians, psychologists etc conducting these studies, but their contact information is pretty readily available. Maybe ask them?You didn't answer my question...
There was a good April 2018 opinion piece in Politico by Jon Stokes called A Gun Nut's Guide to Gun Control That Actually Works. It outlined, in detail, a system essentially identical to what you proposed. Including hypothetical arguments from "both sides" and rebuttals to them.100% agree. I hate the FFL process.
For ease of use, I wish we had a nationwide licensing system that was recognized by all states. All license holders would be issued an ID and then the ATF would provide a limited user portal accessible via an app on your phone. I want to sell a gun to ElkFever2, you show me your license, I scan your QR code your profile pops up as "cleared", we do our transaction. I'd make it an opt in system, if you don't want to participate that's your choice you do the old FFL system.
MA has a pretty brutal licensing process, all said and done my biggest beef with the system is that at the end of the day there is no benefit other than the ability to "exercise my constitutional right," IMHO with that process, including the interview with the Mass Firearm bureau agent, I should be able to order a rifle on europtics and have it delivered to my house.
Current gun processes are stuck, by design, in the 1950s. I think gun owners could benefit from updating laws and regs.
These was definitely my opinion as well, though now I'm wondering if it's correct. Certainly we see other types of attacks around the world, and in the US... but they still aren't at the scale of US mass shootings. For instance if you aggregate Europe, you don't see parity between truck/poison/explosive/knife/ etc attacks with US shootings. In the US context we might, maybe it's a cultural thing?