The Hedgehog
Well-known member
Sorry for a long rant, but this is one that I am passionate about:
As a teacher who spends lots of time with upper elementary & middle school students, as a Montana Hunter Education Instructor, and a parent of a twelve year old and seventeen year old, my opinion is that this is a BAD idea.
Sitting in a ground blind, or box stand and hunting over a game feeder is vastly different from what much of the hunting in Montana is involved with; shots where the shooter is seated and at a bench rest simply do not occur very often here. Physically, most children less than 12 years old have serious problems with recoil and accuracy, much less physically being able to safely carry a heavy rifle over broken ground. This isnt a Texas sendaro hunt, nor is it Pennsylvania or Wisconsin sitting in a tree stand for a couple hours on opening day. Just because they allow youth hunts in other states is no reason that Montana needs to allow them too. There are no studies I am aware of that show that lowering the minimum age to hunt has a positive influence on increasing hunter recruitment.
At sight in days for youth hunts, as well at field course days for Hunter Education, its easy to see the affect of recoil on youth, and many are not hunting with large caliber rifles. I've heard numerous stories from past students about making a poor shot on an animal that resulted in the child never again wanting to hunt again. Children in their early teens grow rapidly in both strength and intellect, both qualities needed for a safe experience. Otherwise, why not issue drivers licenses to 12 year olds, and put them out on the highway at 75mph?
I have students who live and breathe for the chance to get outdoors and hunt and fish. They talk about it with their peer group at school, and they wait their 12th birthday (or now sometimes their 11th birthday) to get out and hunt. Many of them still leave school at younger ages to go on hunting trips with family, and they share pictures of their experience when they return to school (seems like every 10 year old has a cell phone / camera anymore). They are still able to particiapte whether they carry a rifle or not.
One important factor with lowering hunting ages has not been mentioned here: Hunter Education. Currently, children must be 11 years old in order to attend class in Montana. This results in a fairly even age distribution in most hunter education classes, where most students are 11, 12 & 13 years old. Younger kids may attend class, but cannot be certified.
There is a HUGE difference in teaching hunter education concepts to a twelve year old compared to a seven or eight year old. There is a reason that students are grouped by age into school classes. Its tough to teach to a large age difference, especially with the amount of material required for certification, and the reluctance of parents to commit to attending any more than the bare minimum of classes.
Most of the instructors in my region are completely opposed to this legislation, and have STRONGLY opposed to it in the past (this is at least the third session that this bill has been brought forth).
Many of the instructors here believe so strongly in maintaining the present age that they will quit the Hunter Education program if this law is passed. Hunter Education is required by law in Montana, and the program is 100% taught by volunteers, who can barely keep up with the demand for classes now. If they leave, your license dollars will now be spent hiring teachers to teach the course instead of managing fish and wildlife resources.
No one is opposed to children spending time afield with family & friends. I think all of us here, especially the fathers and mothers, can think of no finer way to spend an hour with our children. Some of the most memorable times of my life were with my kids when they hunted and harvested game, or hunted and came home empty handed. But let them wait until they are 11 or 12 years old before you hand them a high powered rifle as the hike the hills with you.
Respectfully now steeping off my soapbox,
A Montana Hunter and Bowhunter Education Instructor
I agree 100%! This will never pass.
What kind of jackass is going to draft a bill that eliminates the need for a hunter's saftey certificate, both firearm and archery, for kids to hunt, so long as somebody's within shouting distance? What a joke.
If you're 5 year old can pass the test.. then my hat's off to you - but it ain't gonna happen. So let's have parents putting infants in for cherished limited quota permits? As if that wouldn't get abused.. What next?!
Something about a long-awaited right of passage makes the first experience really something. I shot my first big game animal at 15, and had been handling firearms unsupervised for longer than I should admit but don't feel like I missed out. My son took a 2-day course in Helena last spring, smoked the test with like a 98%. The instructors were TOP-SHELF. My boy's been riding the bench for many years and was pretty excited to notch his first tag. He was 11. Probably could have passed the test and taken animals for the last 2-3 years, but the way it worked out couldn't have been better.
I don't think this subject is worth 5 pages.. it will never happen.
As that bill is drafted, it's a complete farce.