MTLabrador
Well-known member
Since I don’t think this can get derailed anymore, has anyone here dialed the Nightforce SHV a lot? The 4-16 SHV F1 looks like a lot of scope for the money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got a 5-20 on my ultramag. Been pretty happy with it overall. Does all I ask of it and have dialed it a decent amount. Mine is a second focal plane though.Since I don’t think this can get derailed anymore, has anyone here dialed the Nightforce SHV a lot? The 4-16 SHV F1 looks like a lot of scope for the money.
I agree. My main problem with it is the whole concept of a custom cut dial: for a specific load, for a specific altitude, for a level shot angle. Sometimes oversimplifying doesn't work. All of my CDS scopes just have the uncut MOA dial on it; just dial to the correction for my specific shot scenario.Evidence: the vast adoption of leupold's CDS system
My elk hunting partner has one on a 300 win mag. He's had good luck with it, and dialed it a fair bit.Since I don’t think this can get derailed anymore, has anyone here dialed the Nightforce SHV a lot? The 4-16 SHV F1 looks like a lot of scope for the money.
I've an ATACR and its a great scope. Only thing I could possibly say bad about NF is that they have a very tight eye box compared to some other manufacturers. Not a issue really just something to get used to.Since I don’t think this can get derailed anymore, has anyone here dialed the Nightforce SHV a lot? The 4-16 SHV F1 looks like a lot of scope for the money.
The SHV are a great scope especially for the price. The RTZ and dialing is excellent. Some models don’t have a zero stop but can easily make one for it also. I’d take one over any Vortex product!Since I don’t think this can get derailed anymore, has anyone here dialed the Nightforce SHV a lot? The 4-16 SHV F1 looks like a lot of scope for the money.
Yep! If they offered the force plex in more scopes and with a 44mm. Im sure they would sell quite a few.Be nice if Nightforce offered a better selection of scopes in the 42 to 44 mm objective size. And a clean duplex reticle. mtmuley
I agree. I don't want or need 50mm or bigger on a hunting rifle. mtmuleyYep! If they offered the force plex in more scopes and with a 44mm. Im sure they would sell quite a few.
The newer Japanese Weavers with Micro-Trac tracked and held just as well as the old ones in my experience. Sightrons with Exac-Trac do as well. If it’s not the exact same system, then it’s close enough. The Japanese scopes with Micro-Trac appear to use a slightly different system than the El Paso scopes, but they seem to function quite well.Let's see I own an old ass weaver, an old Bushnell, a couple Vortex, one leupold, and one Redfield. The two old ones are the only ones that hold zero year to year. But Vortex is the only ones that have gone in for warranty
How would a person figure out which have it?The newer Japanese Weavers with Micro-Trac
As much as I agree, I’m very disappointed that their SIs are no longer made in Japan, and that they discontinued their SIIs. The SIIIs, while manageable on a hunting rifle, are definitely a little bigger than I’d prefer. Probably the most annoying thing about Sightron is that all of the FFP scopes have exposed turrets with no lock. Well, if I’m gonna dial, then why do I need reticle in the FFP? If I’m gonna use my reticle for holding, why do I need my turrets exposed?Sightron scopes are underrated and overlooked. mtmuley
I agree. They have a good presence in competitive shooting but get overlooked by hunters. Just bad marketing? Sightron is generally what I’m going to on budget scopes as I get rid of my Vortex’s.Sightron scopes are underrated and overlooked. mtmuley
Use enough different products for long enough and chances are sooner or later your gonna need the warrantee!I personally think we put way too much stock in warranties. I don't under any circumstances want to have to use the warranty.
If I have 5-7 days to hunt halfway across the country, and I have an issue that requires warranty work, that's a really big problem.
I probably just jinxed myself.....
wasn't it .09%Yep. They seem to still be a decent option and if it's consistent error you can rectify it pretty easily but a 9% tracking error is not inconsequential.
Side focus is another thing I can do without. mtmuleyIt seems Leupold has gone down the same path though, with their higher end, high powered scopes being just about as large, and heavy and side focus instead of A/O. Not only does the extra lens for the side focus add weight, but it reduces light transmission. At least they have the new locking turrets.