MTNTOUGH - Use promo code RANDY for 30 days free

Yellowstone Ranger controversy

BigHornyRam

New member
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
433
Location
T Falls, MT
Any comments on the article below?

Paul


Outspoken ranger loses job

By BRODIE FARQUHAR Star-Tribune staff writer




After 24 years patrolling the remote Thoroughfare region of Yellowstone Park, Ranger Bob Jackson has not been rehired this season.

The move has stirred the ire of a U.S. senator and a whistleblower advocacy group that has backed "Action" Jackson through a series of run-ins with the Park Service.

"The Park Service's excuses for not rehiring Ranger Jackson after his quarter century of service are bogus," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a letter Thursday to National Park Service Director Fran Mainella. "The Park Service and Ranger Jackson's supervisors at Yellowstone have exhibited a clear pattern of retaliation and hostility toward Ranger Jackson in the last several years."

Jackson is a backcountry ranger with a high profile in poaching arrests. He is the park's longest-serving seasonal ranger.

A whistleblower complaint was filed Wednesday by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), alleging that Jackson was singled out for staff cutbacks. The watchdog group, which supports state and federal employees, claims Jackson was not rehired because of his well-publicized criticism of enforcement of wilderness rules in the nearby Bridger-Teton National Forest -- in particular, his pursuit of outfitters who use salt to lure trophy elk out of the park.

"Yellowstone Park is putting out a big Bob-Jackson-Is-Not-Welcome mat," commented PEER General Counsel Dan Meyer.

Meyer said that despite an 8 percent budget increase this fiscal year, Yellowstone Park officials are slashing the law enforcement program, reducing the number of seasonal rangers from 48 to 10. Meyers also alleges that patrols in the backcountry, except for search and rescue operations, will cease, eliminating law enforcement where Jackson says poaching is an active and persistent problem.

Park spokeswoman Cheryl Matthews said she could not comment on personnel matters. She did say that as of Thursday, enough money has been found to hire 36 seasonal rangers for the upcoming summer season, and that the park had 46 seasonal rangers last year. That's up from the earlier figure of 10 cited by PEER.

She blamed the law enforcement cutbacks on higher energy costs, a pay raise and money sent to regional headquarters for emergencies.

Matthews said Brad Ross, a backcountry supervisor, has been assigned for the entire season to the Thoroughfare station. But Jackson says supervisors have little backcountry experience because they have so many responsibilities where the tourists congregate.

Complaint

In a whistleblower complaint filed with the federal Office of Special Counsel (OSC), PEER is asking for an expedited review of Jackson's complaint, asking that Jackson be restored as seasonal ranger in Yellowstone's Thoroughfare area (Lake Country sub-district) for June 2 through October 31.

In the document sent to OSC, PEER says the only reason Jackson was given for his deletion from the list of accepted rangers was that Yellowstone is consolidating all law enforcement operations around its permanent employees in order to meet reform requirements implemented at Sen. Grassley's request.

Grassley noted in his letter to Mainella that park superintendents have a history of subordinating law enforcement to other priorities. He cited the Interior Department's own Inspector General report in January 2002, which noted "chronic frustration on the part of Departmental law enforcement officers and a disquieting state of disorder in the structure and operations of law enforcement throughout the Department."

Responding to a claim by Chief Ranger Rick Obernesser that a reduced budget has forced the park to hire fewer full- and part-time rangers, Grassley told Mainella that he wants to "make sure that the appropriate monies are being devoted to law enforcement, and that any alleged budget constraints are not misused to justify preventing an outspoken but valuable ranger from working."

PEER's Meyer linked Jackson's treatment to his recent disclosures that the U.S. Forest Service has been ignoring reports of salt-baiting in the Bridger-Teton National Forest, and that grizzly bears protected under the Endangered Species Act are being killed or put at needless risk by the salt-baiting practice.

In addition, Meyer said that Jackson is a central figure in a soon-to-be-released book about the outfitter culture and abuses in the Bridger-Teton National Forest. Authored by Gary Ferguson, "Hawk's Nest" will be released in May by National Geographic Adventure Publications.

Why go back?

Reached at his 1,000-acre bison ranch in Iowa, Jackson said he wants to go back to the Thoroughfare for several reasons. "I can do the job better than anyone else," he said. The problems in the Thoroughfare country are so daunting and complex, only someone with extensive experience is qualified to deal with it, he said.

"The way it was explained to me when I first came on board, a backcountry ranger is regarded as successful if he survives the first year," said Jackson, much less accomplish lots of real work.

"Another reason is that a lot of people have been supporting me," Jackson said, and he doesn't want to let them down. His battle last year with the Park Service over a gag order actually produced good results for many people, he said. "Biologists throughout the Northwest are free to speak their minds, now," he said.

Finally, Jackson said he doesn't want to see the outfitters succeed in shutting him up, as they've silenced other rangers, game wardens and biologists in the past.

Al Jaeger, communications director for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, said, "Park rangers are the eyes and ears of the American public in protecting our national treasures. We hope that the Park Service is making every effort to staff and protect the Thoroughfare and all of the park's wildlife."
 
It's all political and a load of crap! Does the gov. not recognize seniority when dealing with layoffs? This is the same reason that Dr. Charles Kay is not allowed in the park as a researcher, their views/findings contradict the management going on in the park. The Park Circus is trying to coverup/hide the results of the mis-management of their lands.

FWIW, Bob Jackson is highly involved in the research project that I am a small part of. He is working with scientists and Native Americans on studying the behavior of bison to hopefully be able to use them as livestock on the plains. I've met him and he is as nice as the come and he has a passion for proper management of natural resources.
 
1-P, the gov. doesn't want employees of action, just mindless doults.

The supervisors don't want people under them that can question their "authority", or come up with better solutions or ideas.
 
Crap like this sucks! It's a National Forest,that means I own it too,so tell me what I can do to help make a difference ? Screw the greedy outfitter,I'd rather have the elk for an honest hunter to take!
 
Good post Ten.
I would say the place the Welfare really sits, is in the management that is ousting these people, they have the power to protect their little cash cow and are using it...
These are the individuals that are the ones that you all should be down grading and attacking. Any one else is just using the system ( I should say, most generally, before a coupld of you jump on that last comment and take it to mean every one that is on your hit list and use me as your scapegoat to make yourselves feel better).
 
Would anyone venture to guess that a lot of information has been left out of this one side article? Easy to get the reaction that everyone here has had when you don't include all the facts. Any other comments?

Paul
 
I'm sure there are situations between Mr. Jackson and the PS that were left out. Usually if both sides of an argument are presented it doesn't stir up enough emotion. Hardly anything written (if ever) is written without human bias.
 
I can't say if Ranger Bob is an anti-hunter, but can say he is anti-outfitter. He has gone way out of his way to cause confrontation with outfitters, whether they were deserving our not. Instead of worrying about what is going on inside the Park, he has spent a lot of time causing trouble outside. He was told by the Park to keep his comments personal and not speak on behalf of Yellowstone. He refused to do so, and challenged his supervisors to fire him.

He was a vocal advocate for creating a 3 mile no hunting buffer around the park boundry at least in the Thorofare area, if not the entire Park. What do you hunters think of this potential loss of hunting opportunity? Change anyone mind yet?

There have been a lot of anti-hunter park rangers in the past. Lucky for us, when they have over stepped their authority, they have been fired. There have been incedences of park rangers hazing Bighorn sheep from adjacent public land back into the park prior to hunting season. Incedences of park rangers harasing legal hunters and threatening to arrest them.

Just a few of the many details left out of this article, so as to intentionally make you feel sorry for ranger bob.

Paul
 
I don't agree with the buffer, Yellowstone has too many animals anyway. If he was not doing the job properly or the way he was ordered he should have been fired. Thanks for the clear up.
 
GOHUNT Insider

Forum statistics

Threads
113,569
Messages
2,025,411
Members
36,235
Latest member
Camillelynn
Back
Top