Advertisement

Wyoming Corner Crossing Defense Fund

He could easily install ladders at his own corners, mitigating any damage, and make it so easy to access the checkerboard that hunters would soon grow tired of the crowded hunting.

open the flood gates and your private parcels get even better.

little fred needs a trusted advisor to tell him to shove his fat clown shoes in his mouth for once.

taylor sheridan had the wrong state when he thought up his fanciful world. shits bout to get western in carbon county.
 
He could easily install ladders at his own corners, mitigating any damage, and make it so easy to access the checkerboard that hunters would soon grow tired of the crowded hunting.
I suspect this would also make the hunting on his private sections even better as the animal look for a place of refuge.

Whoever wrote that postcard has a significant mental issue.
 
Perhaps fred and crew should just stay off their ranch if they feel it is unsafe. Asinine to suggest a neighboring landowner stay off their property because it makes you uncomfortable...ESPECIALLY given the testimony/evidence of freds henchmen harassing hunters.
 
Perhaps fred and crew should just stay off their ranch if they feel it is unsafe. Asinine to suggest a neighboring landowner stay off their property because it makes you uncomfortable...ESPECIALLY given the testimony/evidence of freds henchmen harassing hunters.
You know, I never thought of him as a "Karen", but that's a really good way to describe him to someone if starting from scratch.
1689188638085.jpeg
 
This is an interesting development:
Not so fast.

 
This is getting bizarre. The man doesn’t know when to admit defeat. I’m sure telling the judge he was mistaken in his ruling will help his case. 🤣
The ultra-rich never have to admit defeat. They just have to continue the process through the system until they find someone who understands that the system rules don't apply to them.
 
Not so fast.

If everyone else is going to read tea leaves, so will I.

This case is all but over. It's looking more and more like Fred is going to lose his ass in the 10th circuit.

Fred's attorneys tipped their hand when they asked for the stay based on some mean things said on Facebook and a post card. The other half of the reasoning for a stay was based on Skavdahl getting it wrong by not applying Leo Sheep. Not only did Skavdahl not apply Leo, but he said exactly why in his summary judgement. That summary judgement is well written, and I believe the conclusions based on Mackay were correct.

I think Semerad has it right in the article, Fred knows it's not looking good for his "case".
 
You’d think those fancy appeal specialist lawyers of his would have seen that issue coming.
 
Kinda funny seeing the thoughts on this on another site this morning. A large chunk were decidedly against corner crossing due to its effect on private property rights and probably the effect it could have on cornered public some probably are hunting
 
Kinda funny seeing the thoughts on this on another site this morning. A large chunk were decidedly against corner crossing due to its effect on private property rights and probably the effect it could have on cornered public some probably are hunting
Assuming you mean bowsite which is full of partisan dipsh!ts. Anyone that equates corner crossing to some massive threat to property rights watches too much fox news. Property rights were not destroyed by the land grabs to create flood control reservoirs and countless other imminent domain projects, corner crossing isn't even in the same universe.

The problem with the internet is that idiots get a voice nomatter how unqualified. At least it's entertaining.
 
Assuming you mean bowsite which is full of partisan dipsh!ts. Anyone that equates corner crossing to some massive threat to property rights watches too much fox news. Property rights were not destroyed by the land grabs to create flood control reservoirs and countless other imminent domain projects, corner crossing isn't even in the same universe.

The problem with the internet is that idiots get a voice nomatter how unqualified. At least it's entertaining.
Were or were not?
 
Latest on the appeal-


“There is no contention that defendants acted in a threatening or aggressive manner toward [Eshelman] or employees,” the Judge wrote. “If anything, it was Plaintiff’s employees who harassed Defendants while Defendants were on public lands.”

So when are we going to see a countersuit?
 
“There is no contention that defendants acted in a threatening or aggressive manner toward [Eshelman] or employees,” the Judge wrote. “If anything, it was Plaintiff’s employees who harassed Defendants while Defendants were on public lands.”

So when are we going to see a countersuit?
Doubtful. I imagine the four hunters just want to be done with all of this.
 
Back
Top