When is enough, enough?

[MattK]

BigShooter- I believe you do have something against DIY hunters...otherwise you wouldn't want their name changed to "Take it upon yourself hunters". I personally have nothing against landowners. They should have all the rights and liabilities that all other property owners and citizens in the state have. They shouldn't have more rights than any other citizen either. I don't have a problem with guides. If a guide did a good enough job and earned a good enough reputation, he/ she shouldn't need to be "given" tags to ensure his job. You should be able to lease your land to an outfitter if he is willing to pay (but it shouldn't be at the expense of other public or private land hunters). If I put in for a permit, my odds should be the same as every other citizen in the state...no landowner preference, no guide tags. If you get drawn to hunt land in the county you live...good deal, if not too bad just the same as any other citizen of the state. No special priveledges...equal opportunity for everyone. You complain about deer, elk antelope eating your hay...I guess you should allow someone to control the herds...if you don't allow that control to happen...too bad. Just another liability of land ownership. I guess you need better crop insurance. The fact is you just don't like hunters that won't pay you for state owned resource...You are much better off with leasing your land to an outfitter. BTW- what makes you so sure that one of the "dudes" that the outfitter brought onto your land didn't shoot your cows?

 

[DRAFTSTUD]

BSer, I just had to read that post a couple of times, it makes no sense as it is so abstract in the way your thinking bounces from one post to the other. You make statements about Hunters, but you only do so to state your hate for the man. You come across as some sort of Little King and no one should have a statement to the contrary. You make as much sense on this site as I would on a PETA site. John

 

[Nemont]

Jose, I wouldn't bet on the fact that Greenies little sister/bed partner is hotter than cowboymamma, pretty sure cowboymamma doesn't paint her pants on either.

But anyway, back to the topic at hand which is outrage from some square heads about outfitters and landowners.....answer me this: Why is it that landowners not only hate but actually despise hunting season? I know this one....it is because "hunters" drive up and down the road and try to pick off deer on land that isn't open to public hunting. I know a lot of ranchers that can't hardly get a damn thing done all day because they have managed their grass and their herds and they have great hunting, so in turn the public hunters think that it is their right to shoot them. Not only that but they catch the poor dumb bastards sneaking on off of public onto private and so on. This is why they lease to outfitters, so they can do the patroling and they can deal with the Bull Sh@&! This is also why they refuse to let anyone on to hunt that asks, because they have a bad taste in their mouth about hunters. So instead of sitting on hear flapping your soup coolers about how bad outfitters and landowners are, maybe you should start educating your fellow "DIY" hunters about treating ranchers with some respect and maybe in the future you could maybe gain some access on some otherwise tied up places. DIY hunters have done it to themselves, and I have nothing against DIY hunters. Maybe the name should be changed to "Take it upon yourself hunters" meaning to just take it upon yourself to go where you want when you want and have no respect for anyone or anything.

BS.

Can you quote anyone on this website saying they feel they have a right to go anywhere they wish? Landdowners are not downgraded every day on this site the only landowners whining about how difficult their life is you and your other half.

Outfitters have a place in this state, they should not be driving the bus though simply given their numbers. If the numbers are correct and they struggle to hit the quota then it makes no sense to increase the quota, period.

Again you refuse to answer any question and just reframe the same tired old excuse: unters bad, landowners great, outfitters best. Lease your land, rent it, sell it nobody on here cares. However coming to the resident hunters and wanting more free tags for outfitters is something resident hunters have every right to fight against. They have as much right to be politically active and demand accountablility as outfitters or land owners do. Unless you only like the Constitution when it protect your property right and not the public right to participate.

Explain how locking your land up decreases the risk of somebody standing on the pavement and shoot your cows? I have asked 5 times and you have yet to answer, which leads me to believe you know the answer is just a total BS excuse. Lock it but don't blame your loss on hunters because people who do such things are not hunters.

Nemont

 

[Lawnboy]

Great Bull Kurt!! Just when I was feeling good about myself you go and shoot that monster What's the story behind it? Any other picts?

 

[Moosie]

I'm not gunna lie.... I'd punch my tag on that if I got the chance !-!-!! Ohhhh and nice Elk too

 

[Blue Yummies]

I would mount that over my fireplace

 

[Dinkshooter]

One thing that came out of tis thread. If I ever hunt in Garfield county MT I am bring plenty of extry ammo. I will start the 2010 Garfield COunty cattle war. Better call the hotdog company after I leave.

 

[Blue Yummies]

I think the freeman group still has extra ammo over there

 

[tjones]

Jose, I wouldn't bet on the fact that Greenies little sister/bed partner is hotter than cowboymamma, pretty sure cowboymamma doesn't paint her pants on either.

I am guessing cowboymamma's pants have a Skoal ring on the back pocket

 

[shoots-straight]

Does anyone on here know what 6 axe handles wide means?

 

[Blue Yummies]

no, explain

 

[shoots-straight]

Your posting at 9:28 PM, your not allowed to post evenings anymore. Ah, its in reference to an arse.

 

[Dinkshooter]

TTT for the day and Oak

 

[Oak]

Stir, stir, stir....

 

[putm2sleep]

Holy cow.........bad pun?!, hahhaah= > read through this thread and wonder who the heck this prick (bigshooter) is with the cross gender alter ego (cowboymamy)? and why he would come on this site?

 

[noharleyyet]

Why are we reviving old pissing matches when Oak can easily post another state specific pejoritive and we can argue in real time.

 

[Dinkshooter]

1pe·jo·ra·tive noun
\pi-ˈjȯr-ə-tiv, -ˈjär- also ˈpe-jə-rə-tiv or ˈpē- or -ˌrā- or ˈpej-rə- or ˈpēj-\
Definition of PEJORATIVE
: a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle : a pejorative word or phrase

 

[Dinkshooter]

This thread makes me laugh, I love it when the same person post under different log in names

 

[noharleyyet]

This thread makes me laugh, I love it when the same schiz's post under different log in names

Jack and Frank Aulph?

...you remember Michael Hawk doncha?

 

[Dinkshooter]

Oh I remember Mike for sure.