Ithaca 37
New member
"There´s some stuff in the Idaho Legislature that smells like dead fish rotting on the lake shore on a hot August day."
Read about the stuff some Idaho Legislators are trying to pass this year. Some of you in ID are voting for the people who vote "Yes" on these bills. Do you have any idea how your representatives feel about these bills? I bet NONE of the Idahoans here in SI who claim to be so concerned about our rights to hunt have ever done anything to lobby against the bills like this that come up every year. In fact, whenever I bring up the Idaho Wildlife Federation, which is the only organization that has an organized effort to fight these bills, a bunch of you post about what a terrible organization they are!
What are any of you going to do about these bills? Let's hear from all the SI posters who claim they're real involved!
"
The We Don´t Care About Poaching Bill (HB 278) — This would reduce the penalty for poaching a moose to a misdemeanor.
Huh? Does the Legislature want to undo all the strides made in the anti-poaching campaign to make it more attractive to illegally kill one of the state´s premier game animals?
This measure would send a message that the Legislature doesn´t give a hoot about poaching.
The Do Away With Game Wardens Bill (HB 277) — This one would eliminate F&G law enforcement and move that responsibility to the Idaho State Police. Just try to figure this one out.
The state police are dedicated to making Idaho´s roads and highways safer for motorists. There´s a good feeling, knowing that troopers are out there and will come to your aid when you need it. That´s a big job.
They don´t need the added responsibility of chasing all over the mountains looking for poachers and Fish and Game law violators.
Besides, Fish and Game has about 90 well-trained conservation officers. They are educated in wildlife biology and certified in law enforcement. They are doing a tremendous job protecting the state´s wildlife.
As a hunter and an angler, I want the dollars from my hunting and fishing license fees to stay with Fish and Game for law enforcement and not transferred to another state agency.
Let Fish and Game enforce hunting and fishing laws. This is a no-brainer.
The We Don´t Care If You Have A Place to Hunt and Fish Bill (HB 252) — Its subtitle should be The Anti-Wildlife Habitat Bill.
In its initial state, the bill would have prohibited Fish and Game from acquiring more land around the state.
In a time when wildlife habitat is disappearing under pavement, shopping centers and housing developments, the Legislature shouldn´t be trying to curtail Fish and Game´s ability to obtain property and make it a wildlife management area or public hunting area.
Public access is a key issue when it comes to hunting and fishing in Idaho. I invite any legislator to go out hunting with me at Fort Boise Wildlife Management Area near Parma during duck and pheasant season and see how busy it is and how overcrowded it can be.
There´s a need for more public hunting grounds.
When this legislation was proposed, it sent a message that Idaho´s lawmakers don´t care about providing more public access, public hunting grounds and wildlife habitat.
And don´t use the lame excuse that the property is taken off the tax roles when it is owned by Fish and Game.
If legislators would do some research, they would know that Fish and Game makes payments in lieu of taxes that, in some cases, are more than if the land was in agriculture.
Since fiscal year 1992, Fish and Game has paid $1.9 million in payments to counties for its property.
The proposal also would have limited private property rights. It basically wouldn´t let property owners sell their land to Fish and Game.
The House Resources committee this week scaled back the bill to only restrict Fish and Game land purchases in counties that border a foreign country. That´s Boundary County.
What a fiasco. What a waste of time.
The Pay Me More Money Bill (HB 209) — Subtitle this, Sportsmen´s Funds Are Easy Pickings.
This is a bill to change the state´s depredation law.
The depredation system, where sportsmen´s funds compensate farmers and ranchers for damage done by wildlife, has been working OK.
There´s an advisory committee that keeps tabs on the program.
Some sportsmen, who are the watchdogs of the Legislature, are afraid that the proposed legislation is an end run around the committee to pay out more claims and more money for depredation.
It is being called another avenue to redirect sportsmen funds to benefit others, not wildlife.
Call (800) 626-0471 and leave a message for your legislator that you are tired of bills like these.
The right move
OK, the Legislature did the right thing this week.
It dropped the controversial coyote control project in eastern Idaho.
The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee dumped the $300,000 project that mandated Fish and Game to kill coyotes in Unit 69.
The project had no scientific basis and was a way to plunder Fish and Game´s funds.
Good riddance to a boondoggle."
Now, what are you SI posters gonna do about this stuff? Are you gonna keep voting for the Legislators who vote for these bills? Do you even know how your Legislators vote on them? I bet not!
http://www.idahostatesman.com/Extras/zimo/story.asp?ID=34248
Read about the stuff some Idaho Legislators are trying to pass this year. Some of you in ID are voting for the people who vote "Yes" on these bills. Do you have any idea how your representatives feel about these bills? I bet NONE of the Idahoans here in SI who claim to be so concerned about our rights to hunt have ever done anything to lobby against the bills like this that come up every year. In fact, whenever I bring up the Idaho Wildlife Federation, which is the only organization that has an organized effort to fight these bills, a bunch of you post about what a terrible organization they are!
What are any of you going to do about these bills? Let's hear from all the SI posters who claim they're real involved!
"
The We Don´t Care About Poaching Bill (HB 278) — This would reduce the penalty for poaching a moose to a misdemeanor.
Huh? Does the Legislature want to undo all the strides made in the anti-poaching campaign to make it more attractive to illegally kill one of the state´s premier game animals?
This measure would send a message that the Legislature doesn´t give a hoot about poaching.
The Do Away With Game Wardens Bill (HB 277) — This one would eliminate F&G law enforcement and move that responsibility to the Idaho State Police. Just try to figure this one out.
The state police are dedicated to making Idaho´s roads and highways safer for motorists. There´s a good feeling, knowing that troopers are out there and will come to your aid when you need it. That´s a big job.
They don´t need the added responsibility of chasing all over the mountains looking for poachers and Fish and Game law violators.
Besides, Fish and Game has about 90 well-trained conservation officers. They are educated in wildlife biology and certified in law enforcement. They are doing a tremendous job protecting the state´s wildlife.
As a hunter and an angler, I want the dollars from my hunting and fishing license fees to stay with Fish and Game for law enforcement and not transferred to another state agency.
Let Fish and Game enforce hunting and fishing laws. This is a no-brainer.
The We Don´t Care If You Have A Place to Hunt and Fish Bill (HB 252) — Its subtitle should be The Anti-Wildlife Habitat Bill.
In its initial state, the bill would have prohibited Fish and Game from acquiring more land around the state.
In a time when wildlife habitat is disappearing under pavement, shopping centers and housing developments, the Legislature shouldn´t be trying to curtail Fish and Game´s ability to obtain property and make it a wildlife management area or public hunting area.
Public access is a key issue when it comes to hunting and fishing in Idaho. I invite any legislator to go out hunting with me at Fort Boise Wildlife Management Area near Parma during duck and pheasant season and see how busy it is and how overcrowded it can be.
There´s a need for more public hunting grounds.
When this legislation was proposed, it sent a message that Idaho´s lawmakers don´t care about providing more public access, public hunting grounds and wildlife habitat.
And don´t use the lame excuse that the property is taken off the tax roles when it is owned by Fish and Game.
If legislators would do some research, they would know that Fish and Game makes payments in lieu of taxes that, in some cases, are more than if the land was in agriculture.
Since fiscal year 1992, Fish and Game has paid $1.9 million in payments to counties for its property.
The proposal also would have limited private property rights. It basically wouldn´t let property owners sell their land to Fish and Game.
The House Resources committee this week scaled back the bill to only restrict Fish and Game land purchases in counties that border a foreign country. That´s Boundary County.
What a fiasco. What a waste of time.
The Pay Me More Money Bill (HB 209) — Subtitle this, Sportsmen´s Funds Are Easy Pickings.
This is a bill to change the state´s depredation law.
The depredation system, where sportsmen´s funds compensate farmers and ranchers for damage done by wildlife, has been working OK.
There´s an advisory committee that keeps tabs on the program.
Some sportsmen, who are the watchdogs of the Legislature, are afraid that the proposed legislation is an end run around the committee to pay out more claims and more money for depredation.
It is being called another avenue to redirect sportsmen funds to benefit others, not wildlife.
Call (800) 626-0471 and leave a message for your legislator that you are tired of bills like these.
The right move
OK, the Legislature did the right thing this week.
It dropped the controversial coyote control project in eastern Idaho.
The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee dumped the $300,000 project that mandated Fish and Game to kill coyotes in Unit 69.
The project had no scientific basis and was a way to plunder Fish and Game´s funds.
Good riddance to a boondoggle."
Now, what are you SI posters gonna do about this stuff? Are you gonna keep voting for the Legislators who vote for these bills? Do you even know how your Legislators vote on them? I bet not!
http://www.idahostatesman.com/Extras/zimo/story.asp?ID=34248
