Bigjay73
Well-known member
![www.alaskasnewssource.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fgray-ktuu-prod.gtv-cdn.com%2Fresizer%2Fv2%2FIPQKT5SMCFA63EJK3KHXYUCA7M.jpg%3Fauth%3D4b255086045614ef068f1bb6ee4bceb0ad5b590d5c0ce8173f29767f5ec8d5fa%26width%3D1200%26height%3D600%26smart%3Dtrue&hash=9eed840c847522ffdf223a47e2a6e4e1&return_error=1)
Ruling clouds future of Southeast Alaska king salmon fishery
A court ruling has thrown into doubt the future of a valuable commercial salmon fishery in Southeast Alaska.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just came to post about that. HUGE ruling... potentially![]()
Ruling clouds future of Southeast Alaska king salmon fishery
A court ruling has thrown into doubt the future of a valuable commercial salmon fishery in Southeast Alaska.www.alaskasnewssource.com
Fingers are crossedI just came to post about that. HUGE ruling... potentially
This ruling is decades overdue, hopefully it is not too late for our Salmon runs.![]()
Ruling clouds future of Southeast Alaska king salmon fishery
A court ruling has thrown into doubt the future of a valuable commercial salmon fishery in Southeast Alaska.www.alaskasnewssource.com
Not to be pessimistic, but why the Troll fishery? Trolling is the most sustainable commercial fishery. You can at least let them go alive and have a large percentage survive. This compared to gillnets, seining, and trawling bycatch With 100% fatal bycatch rates.This ruling is decades overdue, hopefully it is not too late for our Salmon runs.
I do agree that troll fisheries are less damaging, but who knows what fish to release? A very high percentage of Salmon in the gulf of Alaska are west coast stocks. A much bigger piece of the pie than Alaskan stocks.Not to be pessimistic, but why the Troll fishery? Trolling is the most sustainable commercial fishery. You can at least let them go alive and have a large percentage survive. This compared to gillnets, seining, and trawling bycatch With 100% fatal bycatch rates.
Because you have to start somewhere.Not to be pessimistic, but why the Troll fishery? Trolling is the most sustainable commercial fishery. You can at least let them go alive and have a large percentage survive. This compared to gillnets, seining, and trawling bycatch With 100% fatal bycatch rates.
I think you have to follow the money. The trollers are under represented compared to the other commercial fisheries and ADF&G and the Alaska legislature has demonstrated they are highly influenced by outside sources. My prediction is that it will eventually come out that bycatch and illegal fishing are outpacing trolling and recreational fishing. My skeptical nature is that they are picking on trollers to avoid a fight with the bigger and better represented offenders who pay more in taxes and lobbying. If there are not corresponding restrictions on other fisheries with high bycatch then they are going after political low hanging fruit.Because you have to start somewhere.
I don't think anyone is saying those other methods are better just that it's time to start honestly assessing and mitigating impacts.
I think I should have said why “ just “ the trollers. If they are going to reduce the trolling catch by “X” percent they should reduce the Trawling bycatch allowable percentage by the same amount. Otherwise it smells of politics.I do agree that troll fisheries are less damaging, but who knows what fish to release? A very high percentage of Salmon in the gulf of Alaska are west coast stocks. A much bigger piece of the pie than Alaskan stocks.
I think you have to follow the money. The trollers are under represented compared to the other commercial fisheries and ADF&G and the Alaska legislature has demonstrated they are highly influenced by outside sources. My prediction is that it will eventually come out that bycatch and illegal fishing are outpacing trolling and recreational fishing. My skeptical nature is that they are picking on trollers to avoid a fight with the bigger and better represented offenders who pay more in taxes and lobbying. If there are not corresponding restrictions on other fisheries with high bycatch then they are going after political low hanging fruit.
I don't disagree with any of that. But once you pick off the lowest hanging fruit and you still have a problem, you are forced to go further up the tree, where the bigger fruit is.I think I should have said why “ just “ the trollers. If they are going to reduce the trolling catch by “X” percent they should reduce the Trawling bycatch allowable percentage by the same amount. Otherwise it smells of politics.
Interesting that the Fraser is tanking while the rest of the pacific sockeye are excelling. I like that they're at least working on a commercial buy-back program.https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...-river-return-estimates-drop-by-millions.html
I feel like we've lost the fight already
If you think trolling is the major problem compared to trawling bycatch, then we might needs to compare notes. Trolling bycatch is minimal, and undersized fish and wrong species are released. Trawling bycatch is DOA. Total biomass might be ”acceptable“, but the number of fish that dies is astronomical due to the average size.This ruling is decades overdue, hopefully it is not too late for our Salmon runs.